Home› World & Ancient Coins Forum
Options

Which one and ...why?

FrankHFrankH Posts: 982 ✭✭✭✭✭
in World & Ancient Coins Forum

Considering two different 8 Reales. 60 years apart and WAY apart in mintage process.

A.

B.

Appreciate feedback. :)

Which one and ...why?

This is a private poll: no-one will see what you voted for.

Comments

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 32,220 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i like b. it looks more presentable to me as a coin, jmo

  • Options
    ClioClio Posts: 644 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am not a fan of the double strike on the cob. In addition to that Bolivia is less exciting to me then Mexico and the design on the pillar is just incredibly iconic.

    https://numismaticmuse.com/ My Web Gallery

    The best collecting goals lie right on the border between the possible and the impossible. - Andy Lustig, "MrEureka"

  • Options
    GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Much prefer B. It looks l more presentable.

  • Options
    1960NYGiants1960NYGiants Posts: 3,604 ✭✭✭✭

    I like A - it just screams history!

    Gene

    Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
    Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

    Collector of:
    Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
    Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
    My Ebay
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,379 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Too different to choose one over the other.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    sylsyl Posts: 1,051 ✭✭✭

    I like, and collect, history. To me, it's A.

  • Options
    pruebaspruebas Posts: 5,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @syl said:
    I like, and collect, history. To me, it's A.

    Why is B not history?

  • Options
    SapyxSapyx Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Voted B.

    Why? Because I'm from Australia. B)

    The "dos mundos" coins are very popular here in Australia not just because they circulated here in ye olde colonial days, but also because these are the first coins to actually acknowledge Australia's existence by showing a map of Australia on them (well, the western half of it, anyway - the eastern half hadn't been discovered yet).

    Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.
    Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"

    Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice. B)
  • Options
    FrankHFrankH Posts: 982 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Sapyx said:
    Voted B.

    Why? Because I'm from Australia. B)

    The "dos mundos" coins are very popular here in Australia not just because they circulated here in ye olde colonial days, but also because these are the first coins to actually acknowledge Australia's existence by showing a map of Australia on them (well, the western half of it, anyway - the eastern half hadn't been discovered yet).

    Italy was the center of the universe.

  • Options
    ZwiggyZwiggy Posts: 48 ✭✭✭

    Both are interesting, but I don’t like the cob so much. I think there are nicer cobs in that grade range than this one, the highly offset double strike being the main issue here. So B!

  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,020 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 12, 2024 11:10PM

    I voted for A- the cob- for the simple reason that I currently do not own one, and I do have a Pillar dollar:

    But they’re both cool. I might go for a cob 8-reales in the next year or so (maybe one with a famous shipwreck pedigree). If I can’t afford a gold cob of some kind (which is likely to be the case).

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    BSmithBSmith Posts: 189 ✭✭✭

    I like coin B. I just like the look.

  • Options
    SimonWSimonW Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    B, no question, I feel like it’s tougher to get and more attractive

    I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.

Sign In or Register to comment.