Home› U.S. Coin Forum

GTG - 2010-S Silver JFK Half

mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PR 69-70 dcam

    LCoopie = Les
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,020 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lcoopie said:
    PR 69-70 dcam

    You nailed it! Like 99.99999% of all of these. Flip a coin. Heads=70. Tails=69.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll go with 70

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,020 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    I'll go with 70

    Heads?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 9,847 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Manifest_Destiny said:
    I'll go with 70

    Heads?

    I think the tails side probably grades 70 also.

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lcoopie said:
    PR 69-70 dcam

    This!

  • KiwiNumiKiwiNumi Posts: 210 ✭✭✭

    Either 69 or 70. That's the easiest GTG ever.

  • CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 9,954 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @KiwiNumi said:
    Either 69 or 70. That's the easiest GTG ever.

    But that isn't even an answer unless your talking age then it's close enough.

    I'll cut N some slack and go 69.

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,060 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What’s the point?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 6, 2024 3:13AM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

    Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

    And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count. ;)

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,020 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 6, 2024 4:10AM

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

    Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

    And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count. ;)

    I will disagree on "invaluable ".

    There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

    +1

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

    Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

    And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count. ;)

    I will disagree on "invaluable ".

    There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

    +1

    How about to a new or beginnner collector?

    :)

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,020 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

    Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

    And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count. ;)

    I will disagree on "invaluable ".

    There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

    +1

    How about to a new or beginnner collector?

    :)

    Especially to a new collector. They will all look like 70s. A 68 would be more educational, and scarce.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    There seems to be about a 50% increase in value from 69 to 70 😜

    LCoopie = Les
  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

    Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

    And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count. ;)

    I will disagree on "invaluable ".

    There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

    +1

    How about to a new or beginnner collector?

    :)

    Especially to a new collector. They will all look like 70s. A 68 would be more educational, and scarce.

    I can’t tell the differences between 68, 69, and 70. But I don’t collect JFKs.

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 6, 2024 5:47AM

    Now I hope Coinguy1 can see the “point” of this post,

    :D

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,020 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @MFeld said:
    What’s the point?

    You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

    Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

    And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count. ;)

    I will disagree on "invaluable ".

    There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

    +1

    How about to a new or beginnner collector?

    :)

    Especially to a new collector. They will all look like 70s. A 68 would be more educational, and scarce.

    I can’t tell the differences between 68, 69, and 70. But I don’t collect JFKs.

    68s have more visible defects.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,020 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 6, 2024 6:10AM

    @mikee999 said:
    Now I hope Coinguy1 can see the “point” of this post,

    :D

    How? You didn't put it on his thread nor tag him. He hasn't even seen it

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • mikee999mikee999 Posts: 619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @mikee999 said:
    Now I hope Coinguy1 can see the “point” of this post,

    :D

    How? You didn't put it on his thread nor tag him. He hasn't

    If you can’t see the irony of that , then I can’t/won’t help you.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...