GTG - 2010-S Silver JFK Half

mikee999

lcoopie

PR 69-70 dcam

jmlanzaf

@lcoopie said:
PR 69-70 dcam

You nailed it! Like 99.99999% of all of these. Flip a coin. Heads=70. Tails=69.

Manifest_Destiny

I'll go with 70

jmlanzaf

@Manifest_Destiny said:
I'll go with 70

Heads?

Manifest_Destiny

@jmlanzaf said:

@Manifest_Destiny said:
I'll go with 70

Heads?

I think the tails side probably grades 70 also.

Jimnight

@lcoopie said:
PR 69-70 dcam

This!

KiwiNumi

Either 69 or 70. That's the easiest GTG ever.

Coinscratch

@KiwiNumi said:
Either 69 or 70. That's the easiest GTG ever.

But that isn't even an answer unless your talking age then it's close enough.

I'll cut N some slack and go 69.

mikee999

MFeld

What’s the point?

jmlanzaf

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

mikee999

@jmlanzaf said:

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count.

jmlanzaf

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count.

I will disagree on "invaluable ".

There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

+1

mikee999

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count.

I will disagree on "invaluable ".

There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

+1

How about to a new or beginnner collector?

jmlanzaf

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count.

I will disagree on "invaluable ".

There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

+1

How about to a new or beginnner collector?

Especially to a new collector. They will all look like 70s. A 68 would be more educational, and scarce.

lcoopie

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

There seems to be about a 50% increase in value from 69 to 70 😜

mikee999

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count.

I will disagree on "invaluable ".

There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

+1

How about to a new or beginnner collector?

Especially to a new collector. They will all look like 70s. A 68 would be more educational, and scarce.

I can’t tell the differences between 68, 69, and 70. But I don’t collect JFKs.

mikee999

Now I hope Coinguy1 can see the “point” of this post,

jmlanzaf

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:

@jmlanzaf said:

@MFeld said:
What’s the point?

You start asking that and we aren't going to have any threads.

Plus it’s another one of numerous undetermined #, invaluable, informative, may be entertaining, etc GTG posts.

And finally & most importantly, adds to my post count.

I will disagree on "invaluable ".

There's also limits to how informative it is . 99.9999% of these grade 69 or 70 and 99% of the time we are going to be unable to tell the difference from a photo.

+1

How about to a new or beginnner collector?

Especially to a new collector. They will all look like 70s. A 68 would be more educational, and scarce.

I can’t tell the differences between 68, 69, and 70. But I don’t collect JFKs.

68s have more visible defects.

jmlanzaf

@mikee999 said:
Now I hope Coinguy1 can see the “point” of this post,

How? You didn't put it on his thread nor tag him. He hasn't even seen it

mikee999

@jmlanzaf said:

@mikee999 said:
Now I hope Coinguy1 can see the “point” of this post,

How? You didn't put it on his thread nor tag him. He hasn't

If you can’t see the irony of that , then I can’t/won’t help you.