1976 Topps Baseball Error - Never seen before

Options

I recently acquired a small collection of 70s and 80s Topps cards. Three of the 1976 Topps (including Dwight Evans) had no stats or card number on the back of the card. The green frame was there, but anything that would have been printed in black was missing. Has anyone seen this printing error before?

Comments

  • totallyradd
    totallyradd Posts: 989 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Pics?

  • Derrus
    Options

    At work now, but will add pics when I get home.

  • PaulMaul
    PaulMaul Posts: 5,024 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I haven’t seen it on 76s specifically, but I did have some 74s like that years ago.

  • Centauri
    Centauri Posts: 130 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Dewey NSOB

  • grote15
    grote15 Posts: 30,223 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Derrus said:
    Here is the Dwight Evans -

    Very cool, sort of a reverse blackless.



    Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
  • Willymac
    Willymac Posts: 221 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Sweeeeeet

  • brad31
    brad31 Posts: 3,051 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Most of these are just something uninteresting that we have all seen before. I do have to say I like that card. It isn’t prevalent enough to be considered an error or a variation - but it is a unique and uncommon print defect. I do not think it is valuable but bet you can get somewhere between $10 and $100 for it. If it were mine I would keep and enjoy it. Cool card.

  • Derrus
    Options

    @brad31 said:
    Most of these are just something uninteresting that we have all seen before. I do have to say I like that card. It isn’t prevalent enough to be considered an error or a variation - but it is a unique and uncommon print defect. I do not think it is valuable but bet you can get somewhere between $10 and $100 for it. If it were mine I would keep and enjoy it. Cool card.

    Thank you for the information. I do intend to keep it, as it is a pretty cool defect. I have two others like it, but I can't remember the players off the top of my head.

  • Estil
    Estil Posts: 7,313 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks like a simple case of they forgot to print the black plate part on the back...so does this mean there's most likely 131 others from that same sheet that also have no black on back?

    WISHLIST
    D's: 50P,49S,45D+S,43D,41S,40D,39D+S,38D+S,37D+S,36S,35D+S
    Q's: 52S,47S,46S,40S,39S,38S,37D+S,36D+S,35D,34D,32D+S
    71T: 061,070,141,239,330,384,465,493,496,529,530,532,535,541,544,545,549,552,571,583,590,594,599,611,620,
    629,630,632,644,645,646,648,649,650,658,671,672,673,680,683,688,692,715,735,739,740,744,750
    73T:61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,80,213,235,344,379,433,453,480,497,545,554,580,606,613,630
    95 Ultra GM Sets: Golden Prospects, On-Base Leaders, Power Plus, RBI Kings
  • gemint
    gemint Posts: 6,289 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I would guess that is much rarer than a blank back. I can't recall seeing another like it.

  • Goldenage
    Goldenage Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Estil said:
    Looks like a simple case of they forgot to print the black plate part on the back...so does this mean there's most likely 131 others from that same sheet that also have no black on back?

    Yes

  • Goldenage
    Goldenage Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Derrus said:

    @brad31 said:
    Most of these are just something uninteresting that we have all seen before. I do have to say I like that card. It isn’t prevalent enough to be considered an error or a variation - but it is a unique and uncommon print defect. I do not think it is valuable but bet you can get somewhere between $10 and $100 for it. If it were mine I would keep and enjoy it. Cool card.

    Thank you for the information. I do intend to keep it, as it is a pretty cool defect. I have two others like it, but I can't remember the players off the top of my head.

    The fourth plate run of black ink was not applied. Unless they switched to the six plate machine the Germans made around 1976.

    Here’s mine that I pulled from a 1969 vending case.


    The ones on the right missed the final black plate run.

    They are VERY rare. Keep it. Pressmen usually never forgot to apply a plate.

  • Goldenage
    Goldenage Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    In 1968 opc used cyan, black, green ?, and magenta.

    The bottom card looks Sun exposed but it did not have the final magenta plate run applied.

  • olb31
    olb31 Posts: 4,381 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The Evans is definitely unusual. good idea to keep it. If this were a 1956 mantle, it would sell for a ton as a variation. Dwight just doesn't have that appeal, although I am a fan of those Red Sox teams. Rice, Lynn, Evans, YAZ. incredible.

    Work hard and you will succeed!!
  • Goldenage
    Goldenage Posts: 3,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @olb31 said:
    The Evans is definitely unusual. good idea to keep it. If this were a 1956 mantle, it would sell for a ton as a variation. Dwight just doesn't have that appeal, although I am a fan of those Red Sox teams. Rice, Lynn, Evans, YAZ. incredible.

    Spot on. He can name his price in a trade or sale to an Evans fan who wants all Evans cards.

  • Derrus
    Options

    Thank you all for the information, I'll definitely hold on to these cards!

  • DBesse27
    DBesse27 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I don’t collect Dewey per se, but he’s one of my favorite players, so I’m a buyer at the right price, if you’re willing to sell.

    Yaz Master Set
    #1 Gino Cappelletti master set
    #1 John Hannah master set

    Also collecting Andre Tippett, Patriots Greats' RCs, Dwight Evans, 1964 Venezuelan Topps

  • DavidPuddy
    DavidPuddy Posts: 3,491 ✭✭✭
    Options

    Almost looks like a "Proof"

    "The Sipe market is ridiculous right now"
    CDsNuts, 1/9/15