Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Pulled this from a 1987-D

Comments

  • Options

    being new.... I hit the wrong button... pulled this from a 1987-D MS and sent it away to PCGS, looks like maybe a rag? got caught in-between the obverse & Reverse ?!........also the 2 bottom pictures .. when you turn there coin sideways there is a shadow......

  • Options
    giantsfan20giantsfan20 Posts: 1,750 ✭✭✭✭

    How much in PCGS fees etc did you spend on that item? :(

  • Options
    silverpopsilverpop Posts: 6,870 ✭✭✭✭✭

    ouch that had to smart the wallet :#

  • Options
    1madman1madman Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I actually thought it was spray painted. Probably only ~$100 in tuition

  • Options
    jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 11,305 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Why ask us when you were told by PCGS their opinion that you paid for?
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,371 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jesbroken said:
    Why ask us when you were told by PCGS their opinion that you paid for?
    Jim

    He's asking if it is a strike through because he's claiming to have pulled it out of a Mint Set.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,785 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @jesbroken said:
    Why ask us when you were told by PCGS their opinion that you paid for?
    Jim

    He's asking if it is a strike through because he's claiming to have pulled it out of a Mint Set.

    Interesting scenario. Once you take a coin out of a mint set, can you ever demonstrate that's where it came from? If you find something odd, perhaps you should leave it in the set until you can get solid confirmation regarding what you have?

  • Options
    ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yikes, that looks like a quarter I recently pulled out of an Aldi shopping cart.

  • Options
    morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If it was a piece of rag or cloth there would be a textile pattern visible, which your example does not have. The surfaces were heavily damaged by a wire brush and that is why PCGS called it altered surfaces and not an error.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • Options
    ifthevamzarockinifthevamzarockin Posts: 8,912 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here is one I did with a rotary wire brush. ;)

  • Options
    RampageRampage Posts: 9,702 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I call false on you pulling it out of a mint set looking like that. Perhaps you pulled it from an after-market set, and even then I do not think I would believe it. The coin is worth nothing more than $0.25.

  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,944 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rampage said:
    Perhaps you pulled it from an after-market set

    That was my thought as well.

  • Options
    FrazFraz Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This thread makes baby Jesus cry.

  • Options
    RampageRampage Posts: 9,702 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:
    I actually thought it was spray painted. Probably only ~$100 in tuition

    Easily $100+. Considering the OP probably paid the Mint Error price, which is $65.00. Plus shipping to and from. Cheap tuition only if the OP is truly trying to learn.

  • Options
    tincuptincup Posts: 5,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's a keeper for your collection.... to remind you of the cost of education. We all learn from our mistakes.

    ----- kj
  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,371 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @morgandollar1878 said:
    If it was a piece of rag or cloth there would be a textile pattern visible, which your example does not have. The surfaces were heavily damaged by a wire brush and that is why PCGS called it altered surfaces and not an error.

    Might be acid or a corrosive.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,256 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sadly, it isn't even a candidate for the Sunday bourse "cheap slabs" box. Value is 25 cents.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @morgandollar1878 said:
    If it was a piece of rag or cloth there would be a textile pattern visible, which your example does not have. The surfaces were heavily damaged by a wire brush and that is why PCGS called it altered surfaces and not an error.

    Might be acid or a corrosive.

    It could be a possibility, but I doubt it especially since it looks like @ifthevamzarockin post right below my original post.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file