2022 Uncirculated Mint Set

Options
OLC
OLC Posts: 406 ✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

In some past years this set was advertised on the Mints webpage as struck with greater force. Is this still the case? It is not mentioned this year. Thanks

Comments

  • bramn8r
    bramn8r Posts: 983 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    They do look sharp and proof like

  • pizza442
    pizza442 Posts: 5 ✭✭
    Options

    Just got mine and they are so-so as usual. Denver coins show better strikes and handling, as usual, and the P coins not so much, as usual. Cheek on Kennedy on the P coin, texture-like gritty for lack of a better description. Thought of returning but will get a replacement that is the same I'm sure. Interesting crimping in the plastic housing to keep the coins from 'rattling' around in the housing, that had me looking close to see if the coins were damaged.

  • PTVETTER
    PTVETTER Posts: 6,134 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Got mine yesterday also!

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • TheRaven
    TheRaven Posts: 4,172 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Nothing special about these coins as far as I can see.

    The packaging seems cheaper then previous.

    Collection under construction: VG Barber Quarters & Halves
  • MetroD
    MetroD Posts: 2,568 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I am NOT an expert on the uncirculated coin sets. That said, I found this on the Mint's website ....


    Source: https://catalog.usmint.gov/coins/coin-sets/

  • Che_Grapes
    Che_Grapes Posts: 1,890 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    mine look great!
    I love the quarters - and isn’t it true that the half dollar will be in circulation in 2022? If so, then it is even more cool!!

  • Relaxn
    Relaxn Posts: 1,265 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    My Half has a huge die chip or maybe incomplete strike on the obverse cheek.
    One of my Innovation dollars has 3 slight digs/scratches.
    1st unc set I have bought directly from mint. Quality is garbage. Most likely will never buy another set from the mint... sight unseen.

  • RichR
    RichR Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    My sets look fine...but the only thing that annoys me is NOT including the "S" quarters.

    I'm sorry...but Mint sets used to include coins that were not released into circulation...and was another iincentive to actually buy the set.

    Am I sounding like an old grouch?

    Hey you kids...GET OFF MY LAWN!

  • CoinHoarder
    CoinHoarder Posts: 2,735 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 21, 2022 11:13AM
    Options

    .

  • ndeagles
    ndeagles Posts: 418 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    My Philly coins look terrible, almost as if they were circulated for a few days. Scratches, dings, dirty, rim damage... I guess when you spend $24 for $6 in coins what should you expect... Denver coins were alright, but even they were better past 2 years. I only buy these to keep modern sets current anyways

  • Eighteen63
    Eighteen63 Posts: 136 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I received the set yesterday, opened it and was very surprised the set had a “missing” quarter. After a few minutes of puzzling it over, I flipped the set over and discovered a shifted - not missing - Sally Ride.
    I’m going to cut the sets up anyhow so, no biggie.

    On the contrary, Google is not your friend.

  • RichR
    RichR Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Did they change the packaging this year from a card with a flip cover to simply this card?

    If so, I like this arrangement better.

  • Jzyskowski1
    Jzyskowski1 Posts: 6,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Yup. Last year was different packaging but still poor quality 😉🙀🦫

    🎶 shout shout, let it all out 🎶

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Comment As ...

Categories