Options
1993 1c
RobertLahti
Posts: 328 ✭✭✭
1993 1c.
A separated stand alone M leg.
Doubling to the upper inner column spaces.
Implying a remaining conversion doubling during a far to close AM.
We'll see...WHAT? What brought your attention...?
0
Comments
Even a legitimate grease-filled die is reduced to unrelated gibberish.
No mention of the reverse die crack either
Superb collections are built more by omission than by addition.
Still drunk from happy hour...
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
"conversion doubling"
We are going to need to start a book for all these new numismatic terms.
Sounds like a lot of work...
Might be easier just to take a dictionary and toss it in the blender.
Conversion doubling? Is that another word for Menage a Trois ?
and that looks like a obv cud at 2:30
He missed the grease filled die, die crack, and rim cud, but he found the nonexistent "conversion doubling".
OP must be deliberately talking 💩like this just to get a rise out of others. Otherwise why would he still be doing it? Unless he’s totally bat💩crazy 🤔 Hmmm 🧐
No.
Well Fred W. wrote this when Robert first joined.
I spent a good amount of time, years ago, trying to explain to Mr. Lahti that
what he kept on emailing me was just numismatic pareidolia, and
also metal flow, contact marks, toning, etc. etc. etc., and that he was not
finding anything of any even minor significance.
He never once thought that maybe he was 'looking to hard' finding
his strange anomalies. He's a believer in what he sees on his coins.
His six (6) posts here, since he became a member, illustrate why,
finally, I had to just ignore him and delete his emails to me without
reading or responding to them - about 4-5 years ago.
He is not interested in what anyone else says about his 'discoveries/research'.
After reading that, bat-💩 crazy it definitely is.😵💫😵💫😵💫and he’s been doing this for years? 😳😱😬
Case in point
https://www.cointalk.com/threads/the-first-partially-plated-copper-clad-layer-lincoln.318869/
Steve