Discussion Closed

Options
DirectorKrennic
DirectorKrennic Posts: 11 ✭
edited June 13, 2022 10:30AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Closed

Comments

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • 291fifth
    291fifth Posts: 25,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Coinscratch
    Coinscratch Posts: 11,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    AU53

  • DirectorKrennic
    Options

    @291fifth said:
    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    Don't have to be a condescending titwad. Thanks for the input on what I would assume a worthless post on my part.

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    didn't expect that to go south. for my part, i was just having fun and in no way mocking you.

    i almost expected some potentially sentimental explanation or a variety i didn't pick up on.

    it is for certain that there is no reason to close the thread. if you honestly don't know, you don't know.

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • JBK
    JBK Posts: 17,877 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 11, 2022 5:02PM
    Options

    @DirectorKrennic said:

    @291fifth said:
    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    Don't have to be a condescending titwad. Thanks for the input on what I would assume a worthless post on my part.

    And you don't have to use foul language.

    Also, by deleting the original post, this thread is now a useless waste of space that can't be used to educate others.

  • bsshog40
    bsshog40 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 11, 2022 5:46PM
    Options

    @JBK said:

    @DirectorKrennic said:

    @291fifth said:
    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    Don't have to be a condescending titwad. Thanks for the input on what I would assume a worthless post on my part.

    And you don't have to use foul language.

    Also, by deleting the original post, this thread is now a useless waste of space that can't be used to educate others.

    I didn't see anything that would educate others in the very first two responses that the OP received. It's a no wonder that new people lose interest in the forum soo quickly.

  • JBK
    JBK Posts: 17,877 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @bsshog40 said:

    @JBK said:

    @DirectorKrennic said:

    @291fifth said:
    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    Don't have to be a condescending titwad. Thanks for the input on what I would assume a worthless post on my part.

    And you don't have to use foul language.

    Also, by deleting the original post, this thread is now a useless waste of space that can't be used to educate others.

    I didn't see anything that would educate others in the very first two responses that the OP received. It's a no wonder that new people lose interest in the forum soo quickly.

    I have no idea what the OP contained, but the first two replies answered the presumed question as to whether or not it was worth grading.

  • bsshog40
    bsshog40 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @JBK said:

    @bsshog40 said:

    @JBK said:

    @DirectorKrennic said:

    @291fifth said:
    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    Don't have to be a condescending titwad. Thanks for the input on what I would assume a worthless post on my part.

    And you don't have to use foul language.

    Also, by deleting the original post, this thread is now a useless waste of space that can't be used to educate others.

    I didn't see anything that would educate others in the very first two responses that the OP received. It's a no wonder that new people lose interest in the forum soo quickly.

    I have no idea what the OP contained, but the first two replies answered the presumed question as to whether or not it was worth grading.

    Well then we can agree to disagree whether the posts were educational or not!

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,069 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @bsshog40 said:

    @JBK said:

    @bsshog40 said:

    @JBK said:

    @DirectorKrennic said:

    @291fifth said:
    Why would you even consider sending that in for grading?

    Don't have to be a condescending titwad. Thanks for the input on what I would assume a worthless post on my part.

    And you don't have to use foul language.

    Also, by deleting the original post, this thread is now a useless waste of space that can't be used to educate others.

    I didn't see anything that would educate others in the very first two responses that the OP received. It's a no wonder that new people lose interest in the forum soo quickly.

    I have no idea what the OP contained, but the first two replies I'm withanswered the presumed question as to whether or not it was worth grading.

    Well then we can agree to disagree whether the posts were educational or not!

    I'm with you. Nothing could be learned from either response by the OP.

    and those 1st two responses made the OP delete the post so no one learned anything.

    And we have one more new collector turned off.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    tbh, i think it was @Coinscratch 's post. he called that poor coin an au53 when it was CLEARLY a 53+. i think he got off the hook too easy for such an unnecessary insult to that poor but wonderful coin. ;)

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Coinscratch
    Coinscratch Posts: 11,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:
    tbh, i think it was @Coinscratch 's post. he called that poor coin an au53 when it was CLEARLY a 53+. i think he got off the hook too easy for such an unnecessary insult to that poor but wonderful coin. ;)

    The reverse was 55 the obverse was 50 so I settled at 53. I almost always strive for the happy medium ;)

This discussion has been closed.