Suspect 1875 P Type 1/1 Trade Dollar

What do you think? It has none of the obverse pick-up points of a genuine Type 1/1, the obverse appears to be worn to about a VF level while the reverse is a sharp AU, the reverse has no rim (obscured?) and there appears to a a chop on Liberty's knee but no matching "bump" on the reverse.
https://ebay.com/itm/133788430491?hash=item1f2669709b:g:8GUAAOSwACpgxmq3
Pics for posterity:
mbogoman
Asesabi Lutho
0
Comments
i'm probably not the one to get you where you need to go here but imo:
that chop is a little odd and maybe a small chance it is just pmd
the rev rim could just be cropped out of the image. it is unlikely the coin just ends right at the dentils
maybe these images aren't of the same coin. the seller is highly suspect, or at least the listings. ESPECIALLY the trade dollars. looks like snagged images to me but i could be wrong.
The Type 1 pups I was referring to are not the "usual" diagnostics for a Type 1 Trade $1. The 1875 P Type 1/1 is a very scarce coin. I was referring to the particular die characteristics of the 1875 Type 1, which are a die chip in the drapery to the right of Liberty's knee; a die crack across the upper left quarter above the stars and through the olive branch; a curved die scratch on the left ribbon end, and a couple others.
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
ok tx. i figured you were referring to the rarity but i got a bit side-tracked. ><
so is your inquiry that this may be a counterfeit? i'm not as intimately acquainted with this ol gal as you are so is that super long index finger normal? left hand.
i faintly recall the chip you are referring to. you say there is one in the drapery. i'm having something ring a bell about a big die chip in the wheat sheafs. or is that another year/mm.
either way i'll move along as w/o the image i have for the type 1 rarity, i'm pretty much of no use for assistance.
I can’t get behind that as a chopmark
Actually, the obverse looks like a genuine coin (or a very good fake), but the reverse throws me off. I still think the wear pattern is much less than the obverse. The fields look messed with - definitely cleaned, if not harshly, but I see no indications of mm removal. It would be better if the reverse pic would enlarge, but it doesn't. As a previous poster mentioned, maybe the seller put up the wrong reverse. I don't know. All I know is that the obverse does not look right for a 75 1/1...
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
I agree with you, the serifs on America on the Rev do not click with a 75P and that is not a 75P obv, It appears to be a 75s
11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set
Here are some enlargements of the reverse, if it would help. I'm not a T$ specialist in any way but it truly looks real to me.
Sorry but could not set it for a complete coin, but required two.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
I have requested more, sharper pics from the seller. We'll see.
Interestingly, two of the three bidders on this coin have other bids predominately in the Trade Dollar category...
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
I've been in touch with the seller. He told me that he believes they are not/not chop marks, but damage.
I too have requested additional, larger pics from the seller.
Complete Set of Chopmarked Trade Dollars
Carson City Silver Dollars Complete 1870-1893http://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase.aspx?sc=2722"
Regardless of the auhenticity of the host, I don't think that this coin has an authentic chop.
As folks have noted...not sure it's a 75 I/I. Unless you guys see it, I cannot make out a the die chip (attribute of a real 75 I/I) seen in cotton bale. Image attached. Also missing some die cracks in the stars but the image is tough to see.
keoj
Just look at this seller's other listings...clearly they're listing coins they don't actually own. That should be all you need to see!
I already pm’d him about a fake 78-cc that he took down
Was that the one with the Type 1 reverse? I reported it a few days ago, but didn't notice it was the same seller...
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
Yeah I pm'd him about that one too, and folks on CoinTalk reported it as well.
I, too, saw no type 1 obverse pups. didnt look further into it.
Minor Variety Trade dollar's with chop marks set:
More Than It's Chopped Up To Be
I say a good, or at least fairly good, fake. I don't like the wheat sheaves weakness or the shape of the R and Y in Liberty. Plus what's already been said.
bob
I don't think the obverse and reverse pictures are of the same coin. Fishy.
I have to agree with this statement. I always felt that this was the case, given the different sizes and resolutions of the pictures. Makes no sense.
mbogoman
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/collectors-showcase/classic-issues-colonials-through-1964/zambezi-collection-trade-dollars/7345Asesabi Lutho
also significantly different toning patterns on the two sides. it could be the same coin. either a fake*, or a 75-s.
Minor Variety Trade dollar's with chop marks set:
More Than It's Chopped Up To Be