1616 Buffalo Nickel Possible...rare date variety

hey guys
sorry for creating a pol ..my bad
how bout this coin people . i been looking for a long time now for this variety. 1916 DDO
but this looks different , its like triple die above the 6 in the date
let me no from the Experts....i await with heart pounding and body trembling for the verdict...lol
thank you
0
Comments
Although I don't see any doubling in your
photo (closer up would be helpful), it is
not the rare Doubled Die '16.
You are probably seeing common mechanical
doubling, which is not an error, and carries no
premium.
The 1916 DDO is pretty obvious even on low grade coins, and even dateless coins.
The 1616 Buffalo nickel is rare in all grades.
The doubling on the date will have to look exactly like the one shown below from coinfacts. Otherwise it's not the DDO

Collector
91 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 56 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
ok that's understandable , so what is that in the 6 and above the 6 in the date
the best thing is that i wait till i get the coin in hand then maybe i can have a better look
thanks all
The only anomaly I see on your coin is the aforementioned planchet defect, possibly a lamination, in STATES. That adds no extra value whatsoever.
I see no doubling in the date on your nickel..... the number may be a little 'fat' due to wear.... Cheers, RickO
no doubling there. if you find the rarer triple struck post it here
do you get a triple struck 1916 nickel? @johnny.
It is possible for any coin to be triple struck
Need pictures of both sides of the suspect coin
double or triple struck is not the same as a "doubled die".
A doubled die has a doubled image on the die used to strike the coin resulting in thousands of identical coins.
A double or triple or quadruple "strike" is due to a single planchet being hit multiple times with a normal die. Such a coin would be unique..and easy to spot.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.
Probably a die chip. It is definitely NOT the 16/16 variety.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.