Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

A 1953 Proof Set Flat Pack?

TreevesTreeves Posts: 7 ✭
edited May 22, 2021 3:31PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I got this proof set in an estate auction. It is a 1953 proof set in a flat pack type packaging. I know they were supposed to come in the box set, but as you can, this is not.

Is it possible that the mint was prototyping the flat pack in 1953 and this got out? The finish of the coins is remarkable so I am pretty certain these are proof coins. I just don't know why someone would go through the effort to put it a flat pack as an aftermarket.

Thoughts or suggestions?











Comments

  • Options
    HigashiyamaHigashiyama Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is a fun novelty but I don’t think it is a mint issue.Likely a custom-made package or packaging from a later era proof set reused.

    Higashiyama
  • Options

    Yeah probably. Just seems like a lot of effort to put these coins in this kind of packaging, and not in Capitol holders. Also the mint tokens weren't used until 1955 - and even that was hit and miss.

    I am curious, @djm, you mentioned the "United States Mint embossed in the plastic",. Where would that show? I don't see that in any of my cellophane packaging. Thanks!

  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 10,001 ✭✭✭✭✭

    After market packaging, I have seen similar

  • Options

    Would it be worth leaving as is, or putting in a Capitol case?

  • Options
    morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Kind of cool but definitely not mint issue.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • Options
    djmdjm Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Treeves said:
    Yeah probably. Just seems like a lot of effort to put these coins in this kind of packaging, and not in Capitol holders. Also the mint tokens weren't used until 1955 - and even that was hit and miss.

    I am curious, @djm, you mentioned the "United States Mint embossed in the plastic",. Where would that show? I don't see that in any of my cellophane packaging. Thanks!

    I did a quick look at some of my cellophane packaging. The only ones I saw it on were the souvenir sets, it is on the top of the package .

  • Options
    RubiconRubicon Posts: 201 ✭✭✭

    Quality of coins doesn’t seem the greatest. Are these true proof coins?

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rubicon said:
    Quality of coins doesn’t seem the greatest. Are these true proof coins?

    I disagree. The quarter and nickel look nice.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coins do not seem to be proof quality coins.... Perhaps that is just from the pictures, but my impression is they are mint quality coins, but not proofs....ICBW.... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,438 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If this was from an estate auction, packing the coins in aftermarket film could have been done last year or 60 years ago. Who knows?

    If those were my coins, I would get them out of the unknown film and into a Capitol Holder or equivalent. For sure, it will help prevent hairlines, make for a better display of the coins, and give them better protection. Just my 2 cents.

    It is a neat novelty as another has posted, not seen often.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,246 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I is nothing more than an aftermarket heat-sealing pack. It isn't "neat" or "special" in any way. Who knows when it was done or why. To me it is just five raw proof coins that I can't view very well because of the plastic that covers them.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    WinLoseWinWinLoseWin Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Once watched a dealer I know buy a flat pack 1954 Proof set at a show without really looking at it. Just went by the sheet and bought it. When he mentioned what year, I said they didn't make flat packs that year.

    Looking closer at the coins, which he should have done at first, they were badly hairlined and a couple may have been polished business strikes. The half was no better than Proof-60.

    So that 1954 set was clearly made to deceive which has probably happened with other sets also.

    The original poster's coins appear to me to look fairly decent rather than a deception. Still, removal from the packaging might be a good idea to better see and preserve the coins.

    If you remove them maybe post some additional pictures here to better show how they look.

    "To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file