Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Crazy price for 1961 ms 66 fs nickel.

2

Comments

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 21, 2021 4:58PM

    @robbylu52 said:
    So if I found a 1961 nickel with almost 90% full steps it would be worth virtually nothing but add fs designation and it is now $16,000?

    First of all, a 1961 nickel in 66 with 90% full steps is not "worth virtually nothing", it's worth $50 or $60.

    I found a 1926-S dime in 67 with 90% FB, it's 10k. Add FB and it's 55k.

    I found a 1931-S dime in 67with 90% FB, it's $900.. Add nothing but FB and it's $17,500

    I found a1945 dime in 63 with 90% FB , it's $14. Add nothing but FB and it's $6500

    ​I found a1945 dime in 67 with 90% FB , it's $75. Add nothing but FB and it's $47,500

    I found a 1961 nickel in 66 with 90% full steps and it's $60. Add nothing but FS and it's $20,000

    eReally, what's the difference. The price difference for the 1961 nickel looks modest compared to the 1945 Mercury dime.

    [All prices via PCGS price guide.]

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Just giving collectors some food for thought. Just seems strange to pay such a premium for an essentially common date modern nickel just for fs,.? I am not telling anyone how to spend their cash. Just stating an opinion. I am a purist old time collector who doesn’t buy into fads.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    If I am spending 5 figures for a 1961 nickel Mr. Jefferson needs to pop out of the case, Lol.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    How many collectors would spend this money for such a nickel or a ms 68 silver dollar. Just curious if others agree with me.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    1881s etc. that is what I mean.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Don’t mean to offend fs collectors just don’t understand the value that’s all

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    I will buy all the 90%.! That’s tremendous value. Will buy fb fh if the multiples aren’t crazy.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I will buy all the 90%.! That’s tremendous value. Will buy fb fh if the multiples aren’t crazy.

    I don't disagree with you. I don't play the top pop game. But I don't deny that there is value there and that some people want those very rare condition coins.

    If I were a billionaire, I could not bring myself to spend $5 million for ANY coin. That doesn't mean there are no coins worth $5 million. It means there are no coins worth $5 million to me.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    But there are paintings not even by the masters selling for a $100 million or so and a great coin isn’t worth buying for $5 million. If I won mega millions for several hundred million I would be buying these gem coins left and right lol. These are irreplaceable coin masterpieces

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Some are in collections that will rarely if ever available. Don’t think you are a true coin connoisseur.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You seem to be having difficulty with the concept that not everybody likes the same things equally.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    I understand completely. But that doesn’t invalidate my opinion about the value of these coins. I thought I was giving a rational thought about this topic but seems like collectors are taking offense. I never said people shouldn’t spend money as they see fit. Seems like I am ruffling their feathers by questioning the wisdom of spending such large sums ..

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,075 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I understand completely.

    At 6:43PM, you said: "just don’t understand the value that’s all"

    Just sayin'.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Most of these comments are on conditional rarity as opposed to true rarity. So a ms 69 1881s Morgan could be priced at say $50,000. Is it truly rare, no. I see this more and more with these so claimed registry type coins being advertised. Common coins will never be rare. So that’s my point with the 61 nickel. Let’s see if these wonder coins stand the test of time value wise

  • Options
    OmegaraptorOmegaraptor Posts: 541 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I own a Civil War Token with fewer than 10 known examples, and it's a nice one too. It cost me $57. That is a rare piece, but since there's little or no collector demand for it, it's not going to sell for big money.

    Meanwhile a 1916-D Merc in AG-VG grades is common. I can go on Ebay or to any coin show and find many. But how many Mercury Dime collectors are there? Lots, and all of them need a 1916-D to complete their set.

    "You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."

  • Options
    AotearoaAotearoa Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That dead horse has been beaten to smithereens.

    Smitten with DBLCs.

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    So if DLRC is asking $16,000 as an opening bid, seems astronomical to me

    The solution is simple.
    Don't bid on it.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    I never would. My money will go only into real value.

  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,931 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ahh....... OK.

    Bizarre thread.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    CAC adds value. Fb 65,000 not crazy at all compared to $39,000. 61 nickel $50 to $16,000 fs very crazy

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    No comparison with your other examples

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I never would. My money will go only into real value.

    No, your money will go into YOUR PERCEPTION of real value. That is not the same thing.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    Some are in collections that will rarely if ever available. Don’t think you are a true coin connoisseur.

    That's a very funny thing to say given that this whole thread is about your individual perception and yet you deny mine.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Just surprised you are a enthusiastic collector who became a billionaire and won’t spend a mere 5 million on a great historical coin. Most coin people dream of this scenario

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Just seems like you were trivializing great rarities

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    These are our Picasso’s

  • Options
    leothelyonleothelyon Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I really don't care what others spend on their coins. It does bother me somewhat whether they really know about the quality of those coins they're buying. Poorly struck coins, for example. I guess the only sensible thing I can say to possibly help them understand how to better grade their own coins .....a higher quality coin can not have more marks than a lower quality coin or worse, less of a strike.
    But is there a better way to illustrate this than to post a worthy coin?
    With 30+ years with this series, my 1939-P Rev. of 1938 coin is the only example I have that shows all 5 steps on the left end steps of the Monticello (your left). The right side/end is always fully struck. For those collectors who search for the earliest of die states on their coins also look for sharp detailed windows where that section line on top of the windows stands out in full detail......on all four of them.
    I can't show that coin because it doesn't blow up like the one posted. Right click on photo to open up in another tab to make it larger. Check out the left end steps how they aren't full and how sharp the top of windows are. This 1942-S is more of a full step example than most out there. Had the strike been less, the steps would have filled out more.

    Leo

    The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!

    My Jefferson Nickel Collection

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Aotearoa said:
    That dead horse has been beaten to smithereens.

    Horse meat is tough if you don't tenderize it properly.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Beautiful nickel. What eye appeal

  • Options
    WCCWCC Posts: 3,232 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    Just surprised you are a enthusiastic collector who became a billionaire and won’t spend a mere 5 million on a great historical coin. Most coin people dream of this scenario

    I doubt it. If this were true the price level would likely be noticeably higher, in US coinage and otherwise.

  • Options
    yspsalesyspsales Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 22, 2021 7:25AM

    @robbylu52 said:
    I never would. My money will go only into real value.

    You never answered my question.

    If you found a 1961 in a mint set and it graded MS66 FS... what would be your asking price?

    Apologies to Churchill and Adam West, but that sir, "is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, but perhaps there is a key. That key is [ your financial ] interest."

    BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    I would price it below the cpg coin estimate like DLRC does or place it. In their auction at no reserve to give the collectors a break

  • Options
    GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I would price it below the cpg coin estimate like DLRC does or place it. In their auction at no reserve to give the collectors a break

    "To give the collector's a break" ??

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Yes I would price at well below the cpg to make the price attractive. Why I should give it away for nothing?

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Just because some people buy into the hype of full steps

  • Options
    daltexdaltex Posts: 3,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Gazes said:

    @robbylu52 said:
    I would price it below the cpg coin estimate like DLRC does or place it. In their auction at no reserve to give the collectors a break

    "To give the collector's a break" ??

    It's impressive to misquote a prior post, even putting the alleged statement in quotation marks, and yet somehow change the grammar from correct into incorrect.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    Just because some people buy into the hype of full steps

    And yet you bought into the "hype" of "full bands" judging by the coin you purchased for your CAC experiment.

    I think you just don't like/respect Jefferson nickels.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Have nothing against Jefferson nickels, just questioning why a 1961 nickel in would jump from $50 to $15,000 because of a full step, which is more esoteric than the ms 1945 fb Mercury which is more established and popular and also overpriced. At least the standing liberty quarter fh is a more visible difference in a coins strike.
    And I paid pennies for my 1942 ms 65 fb designation over the regular non fb.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    I would rather buy a very high grade early Jefferson which has tremendous eye appeal than pay a huge premium for a late date huge mintage fs coin

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    Don’t need the extra steps to validate my Jefferson

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    I would buy a 1926s ms 65 fb for say $60,000 as opposed to $15,000 for a non fb. This is a legitimately rare coin in ms regardless of fb designation. Paying $50,000 for a 1945 fb is over 1000!! multiple on non fb

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,244 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I would buy a 1926s ms 65 fb for say $60,000 as opposed to $15,000 for a non fb. This is a legitimately rare coin in ms regardless of fb designation. Paying $50,000 for a 1945 fb is over 1000!! multiple on non fb

    Because that is how rare it is.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    rec78rec78 Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I understand completely. But that doesn’t invalidate my opinion about the value of these coins. I thought I was giving a rational thought about this topic but seems like collectors are taking offense. I never said people shouldn’t spend money as they see fit. Seems like I am ruffling their feathers by questioning the wisdom of spending such large sums ..

    Value is in the eye of the purchaser. A bag of FS 1961 nickels could be found tomorrow. Bu unsearched for FS 1961 nickel rolls are still out there. Search for one and see how many you can find. People with big money may think a little differently. Anybody can get a 1916-D dime, but few if any, can get a FS 1961 Jefferson nickel. The value is there, now that you know how rare a 1961 FS Jefferson nickel is, maybe you can cherry pick one and make a lot of money on it. I search for them because of the profit potential, not because I am interested in collecting them.
    I will say that I enjoyed this thread.

    @robbylu52 said:
    I would buy a 1926s ms 65 fb for say $60,000 as opposed to $15,000 for a non fb. This is a legitimately rare coin in ms regardless of fb designation. Paying $50,000 for a 1945 fb is over 1000!! multiple on non fb

    A 1961 FS Jefferson is a legitimately rare coin also.

    image
  • Options
    jomjom Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @robbylu52 said:
    I would rather buy a very high grade early Jefferson which has tremendous eye appeal than pay a huge premium for a late date huge mintage fs coin

    Well, good for you. Other people would like to pay $16k for FS Jeff Nickel or $45K for a FB Merc dime. For that matter some people wanted to purchase an 1822 Half Eagle for $8 million. If you really think about what's the difference in any of those? DEMAND...the value comes in when the demand is high but the supply is low. It all works itself out eventually.

    @rec78 said:

    @robbylu52 said:

    Value is in the eye of the purchaser.

    And how many "purchasers" there are relative to how many of those items are available. If there are enough people who desire 1961 FS nickels and there are few available...the value skyrockets. Sounds like basic econ to me.

    jom

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    A 1822 half eagle is like a Rembrandt A.19th century masterpiece blue chip investment. One of the greatest coins. Legitimately rare, not relying on some add on like fb fs fh etc. to achieve rarity. I think people are missing the point of inherently rare vs conditionally rare. A 1961 nickel is still a high mintage more modern coin, as opposed to very rare older low population established collector coins that will always be in demand.

  • Options
    wrightywrighty Posts: 840 ✭✭✭✭
    edited April 23, 2021 1:41PM

    I think the only thing you can do is vet a number of 1961 nickels with your discerning eye and submit to the grading services to ascertain their legitimacy.

  • Options
    robbylu52robbylu52 Posts: 287 ✭✭✭

    If I am buying a late date common coin it would be a 1955 double die penny or a 1942/1 dime which are major established rarity’s and have dramatic eye appeal

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file