Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

One of these Walkers is graded MS67 while the other is MS62. Can you guess which is which?

braddickbraddick Posts: 25,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

Both NGC graded. In no particular order:


The other one:


Comments

  • Options
    coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,453 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What date is the second one with all that... toning on it.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Options
    Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 7,165 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the 2nd one is the higher grade one, just based on the strike straight up the middle of Liberty and on eagles chest feathers

    Mr_Spud

  • Options
    CatbertCatbert Posts: 8,183 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Are they the same date/mint? Pic 2 is horrible to evaluate, but I’d say pic 2 has the better strike and eye appeal (?) for the 67.

    Seated Half Society member #38

    "She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
    running like a water color in the rain...."
  • Options
    airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,702 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As photographed I think the second one has flat spots on the feathers and Liberty. Both pictures are of poor quality, especially with the type of toning the coins have, and there’s no easy way to tell what surfaces are muted versus just poorly lit. I think the top one is the higher grade, but I don’t like each as photographed, and certainly wouldn’t buy either based on those photographs.

    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • Options
    JustacommemanJustacommeman Posts: 22,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see you are really working on your set Pat

    m

    Walker Proof Digital Album
    Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
  • Options
    koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think #1 is the 62.

  • Options
    oldUScoinsoldUScoins Posts: 243 ✭✭✭✭

    Top: 62
    Bottom: 67

  • Options
    CocoinutCocoinut Posts: 2,541 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the first one is a 62, but if they looked like the photos, I wouldn't want either of them.

    Countdown to completion of my Mercury Set: 1 coin. My growing Lincoln Set: Finally completed!
  • Options
    Sandman70gtSandman70gt Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The unattractive toning on both make it a bit tough to see the defects. However the strike on the 43s is very weak. It also has some chatter in the fields on reverse and on the sun obverse. It warrants the 62.
    Not sure the 2nd one is 17 d reverse? Pic is not good. So I'll take your word on a 67. Not my cup of tea

    Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder

  • Options
    clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 16, 2021 8:54PM

    The top one looks like it was wiped with a Brillo pad under the toning. It’s also extremely ugly. Why do I have a feeling it’s the opposite of what I think?

    2nd one looks like 1947 mint set toning.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like the 2nd coin.

  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 22,968 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My guess is that the top coin is the MS62 and the bottom coin MS67. The top coin appears to have myriad hairlines across the fields while the bottom may have attractive toning.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    top 62
    bottom 67

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • Options
    orevilleoreville Posts: 12,292 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 16, 2021 10:04PM

    definitely #2 is the 67 but the obverse seems to have ugly toning .. I cannot even tell what date it is.....while the reverse has much prettier toning and really is awesome .

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • Options
    vplite99vplite99 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Top: 62
    Bottom: 67

    The MS 67 reverse is hammered!

    Vplite99
  • Options
    CoinJunkieCoinJunkie Posts: 8,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The bottom coin has far superior luster, hence I concur it's the 67.

  • Options
    BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess you wouldn't have asked if it were easy to answer. So will be the counterpoint and guess the 1st got 67 by mechanical or other error. Neither coin all that appealing, and that's yer thang.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,740 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinbuf said:
    What date is the second one with all that... toning on it.

    I think it's a 47-D, probably from a mint set and graded 67.

  • Options
    Tom147Tom147 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    top 62, bottom 67

  • Options
    stevebensteveben Posts: 4,666 ✭✭✭✭✭

    top 62, bottom 67. walkers are hard to grade (my opinion) and this is just a guess based on the photos alone.

  • Options
    yspsalesyspsales Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see alot of little ticks on #1.

    The face is obliterated on #2

    Actually leaning #1 as the 67

    BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out

  • Options
    batumibatumi Posts: 936 ✭✭✭✭

    @Cocoinut said:
    I think the first one is a 62, but if they looked like the photos, I wouldn't want either of them.

    Thiswould be a case of my ignoring the tpgs grading opinion regardless. Imho, both coins are unattractive, and I would keep walking even if I was looking to purchase some WLH's.

  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No doubt the first one is the ms62.

    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 32,316 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The bottom one I like better

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62
    67

  • Options
    lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,875 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62/67

    LCoopie = Les
  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭✭✭

    62
    67

  • Options
    Batman23Batman23 Posts: 5,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see several marks on the top one and I see booming luster in the bottom one. I'm going with:
    62
    67

  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Give yourselves (most of you) a pat on the back. And I agree, the sellers photos are tough. (I did purchase the top one).


  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well... I like WLH's... most of them anyway ;) I would not purchase either one... but I would sure examine the second one in an attempt to understand the (to me) ridiculous grade on the label. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    Well... I like WLH's... most of them anyway ;) I would not purchase either one... but I would sure examine the second one in an attempt to understand the (to me) ridiculous grade on the label. Cheers, RickO

    I'm certainly no expert, but my guess would be they judged the toning to be super original and bumped the grade up by 2 or 3 steps to the ms67 grade.

    By the way, I'm not liking the ms67 grade as I think it's an overgrade.

    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I 'LIKE' the second coin better.....No hairlines, fewer abrasions, better luster and likely ORIGINAL. BUT, do I like it at the MS 67 superb gem level? Not especially. To each his/her own....

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I really like the 2nd coin.
    1st one, not so much.

  • Options
    LRCTomLRCTom Posts: 857 ✭✭✭

    I'm not seeing MS-67 on the second coin at all, with that strike. The reverse is very nice, but that obverse? Spare me. I don't think I'd pay 64 money.

    LRC Numismatics eBay listings:
    http://stores.ebay.com/lrcnumismatics

  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,093 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm a little skeptical that the top coin is truly MS....

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The second coin's reverse gives it away, it appears to have the strike and luster to be a higher graded coin. The first coin's obverse looks like it has a lot of wear but not discernable with the photos, but definitely a lower grade than the second coin.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Options
    batumibatumi Posts: 936 ✭✭✭✭

    @LRCTom said:
    I'm not seeing MS-67 on the second coin at all, with that strike. The reverse is very nice, but that obverse? Spare me. I don't think I'd pay 64 money.

    Agreed. Especially when '47-D's are readily available with good strikes and luster. A far more attractive piece-imo-can be had for a C-note.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file