What is it about key dates and being engraved?
I feel like I see more key dates that are engraved than common dates, is there a logical reason for this?
Also I get so enfuriated when I see a key date that is engraved, the damage haunts me. On the bright side it can be more affordable to a collector.
What brought this up today? Ive been looking for an 89CC for the collection and came across this one. hopefully the carver was born in 1886. ![]()
End of rant
Comments
-
Maybe being a key date kept it out of the melting pot? Maybe common dates with graffiti got melted long ago?
Mr_Spud
6 -
Confirmation bias. You just don't bother to note it on a common date.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
6 -
As Mr_Spud said, many of the common date graffitied coins found their way to the melting pot years ago. There’s a strong incentive to save a rare date with graffiti, but not common dates with graffiti, so graffitied rare dates seem to be over-represented. Most likely all dates had an equal chance of being graffitied.
This is similar to what was discovered with damage patterns on bombers in WWII. The military noticed that damage on returning planes seemed to be clustered in certain areas, while damage in other areas was never observed. Based on this, they thought that they would be best served to increase the armor protection on the areas where the most damage was seen. However, a statistician noted that the analysis was only based on surviving planes, and planes with damage outside of the commonly observed areas never actually made it home because the damage was too critical to survive. Therefore, it was ultimately decided to increase the armor where no damage was observed.

(Image from Wikipedia)11 -
Most for that date/mm under $300. are totally trashed. That one isn't as bad as others.
0 -
Who would bother to re-engrave a common coin unless for practice?
Edit- just realized we are talking about engraving, not re-engraving.Collector, occasional seller
0 -
@Mr_Spud said:
Maybe being a key date kept it out of the melting pot? Maybe common dates with graffiti got melted long ago?Exactly
Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.1 -
Some engraved coins (key or not) are attractive... Others not so much. A key date (such as the OP) is worth keeping though....Cheers, RickO
0 -
Let's not forget that when these coins were engraved they were nothing more than pocket change worth only face value rather than rare and valuable "key dates".
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire1 -
Life is short. Being infuriated over an ebay advertisement is first world problem angst.
Seated Half Society member #38
"She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
running like a water color in the rain...."2 -
What jmlanzaf said.
0 -
@NSP said:
As Mr_Spud said, many of the common date graffitied coins found their way to the melting pot years ago. There’s a strong incentive to save a rare date with graffiti, but not common dates with graffiti, so graffitied rare dates seem to be over-represented. Most likely all dates had an equal chance of being graffitied.This is similar to what was discovered with damage patterns on bombers in WWII. The military noticed that damage on returning planes seemed to be clustered in certain areas, while damage in other areas was never observed. Based on this, they thought that they would be best served to increase the armor protection on the areas where the most damage was seen. However, a statistician noted that the analysis was only based on surviving planes, and planes with damage outside of the commonly observed areas never actually made it home because the damage was too critical to survive. Therefore, it was ultimately decided to increase the armor where no damage was observed.

(Image from Wikipedia)Very,VERY, interesting.
4 -
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520.1K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 61 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum




