Options
If not for damage could this be a 1943 1C?
Chrisley
Posts: 20 ✭
What causes the black molten look shown on the coin? Any info will be appreciated. Thanks
](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/editor/2r/kita4v15mnrx.jpg "")
in Florence South Carolina.
emai
Tagged:
0
Comments
It's just corroded.
It's also not a 1943, While the date is damaged, that does not look at all like a 3. Size and shape are wrong.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
I like that black stuff.
It looks like an attempt to make it into a 1943.
no
Top 10 Cal Fractional Type Set
successful BST with Ankurj, BigAl, Bullsitter, CommemKing, DCW(7), DesertMoon, Downtown1974, Elmerfusterpuck, Joelewis, Mach1ne, Minuteman810430, Modcrewman, Nankraut, Nederveit2, Philographer(5), Proofcollection, Realgator, Silverpop, SurfinxHI, TomB and Yorkshireman(3)
Not a '43 cent, appears to have a tar-like residue. Definitely Post Mint Damage (PMD). A long soak in acetone (pure) would probably remove the residue, though not really worth the effort. Cheers, RickO
Not worth bothering with. Spend it.
Not even close, imo
The tail of the “3” doesn’t extend far enough. It would be nearly as low as the bottom the the 9 if it was a 1943. I can see how a coin like that can get your blood up though! I’m guessing PMD 1946
What is that black stuff?
No.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
I think also 46
Ya Know what ? I'm gonna change that.
44