Options
1922 no/weak D. Thoughts?
bigtime36
Posts: 965 ✭✭✭✭
Collect raw morgans, walkers, mercs, SLQ, barber q. Looking at getting into earlier date coins pre 1900s.
0
Comments
I would say no.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Too beat up to tell.
Too far gone to be able to say anything about it.
Both 2s seem equal strength of strike. Worn 1922-D is the call.
At best it's a weak D because the reverse is to weak for the good one!
Liberty appears to be strong the whole way across which means it is not a no d. Plus the 2's as earlier stated.
I agree with the above PUP's (Pick Up Points)....just a worn '22D.... Cheers, RickO
The corrosion alone would keep it from grading. If it were mine, I'd spend it.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Worn out 1922 D. IMO.
Is that coin even a Lincoln Cent?
I can't tell
Pete
With a missing D mintmark, it should weigh less than one with a mintmark.
How is the overall weight?