Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Need some grade opinions on this Barber half please

erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,419 ✭✭✭✭✭


Comments

  • Options
    amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks buffed or lightly whizzed from the pictures. AU Details.

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto Posts: 4,098 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 26, 2020 9:04AM

    I am torn, but... if off eBay and was looking and I had to make a call, I see an over processed commercial 62 that is strike and luster limited with avg to minus eye appeal. It would need further discounting if in a not collectible NGC or ANACS holder. Cool Holder could bump it up a bit in the liquidity dept.

    In hand it could be a decent 58 but I could see a generous 63 depending on when it was holdered

  • Options
    bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m blowing these pics up on my IPad and I’m not seeing the whizzing. Does look like it has seen one too many dips with muted luster. 58-62 if it straight grades.

  • Options
    scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 2,068 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seems 58-61 by details.

  • Options
    astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 26, 2020 9:16AM

    @amwldcoin said:
    Looks buffed or lightly whizzed from the pictures. AU Details.

    My first impression as well. If the surface has not been altered, it has been "over dipped." Seems to have the appearance of a "Choice BU" Barber half from one of those multipage ads in Coin World.

    Edited to remove duplicate quote ...

    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,169 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A typical overdipped AU. Sooooooooo many Barber Halves have suffered this fate. :(

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with the 'over dipped' assessment....It gives the surface a 'flat' appearance with muted luster. Probably was covered with ugly tarnish pre dipping. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58

  • Options
    CalifornianKingCalifornianKing Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭✭

    AU/Unc details. Cleaned. Looks slightly wizzed and/or over-dipped

  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 22,960 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What kind of lighting was used for the images? Was it a fluorescent or ring light? I ask because the images are showing a really muted or low amount of luster and the surfaces "feel" soft. I'd guess anywhere from AU55 (for a true AU58 with very over-dipped surfaces) all the way up to MS62 (for a dipped, otherwise clean coin with mushy strike). I really can't get a handle on the surfaces, however, other than they are not original.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,419 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:
    What kind of lighting was used for the images? Was it a fluorescent or ring light? I ask because the images are showing a really muted or low amount of luster and the surfaces "feel" soft. I'd guess anywhere from AU55 (for a true AU58 with very over-dipped surfaces) all the way up to MS62 (for a dipped, otherwise clean coin with mushy strike). I really can't get a handle on the surfaces, however, other than they are not original.

    Seller images, so I cannot make them any better. Who knows what sort of lighting they used.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @erwindoc said:

    @TomB said:
    What kind of lighting was used for the images? Was it a fluorescent or ring light? I ask because the images are showing a really muted or low amount of luster and the surfaces "feel" soft. I'd guess anywhere from AU55 (for a true AU58 with very over-dipped surfaces) all the way up to MS62 (for a dipped, otherwise clean coin with mushy strike). I really can't get a handle on the surfaces, however, other than they are not original.

    Seller images, so I cannot make them any better. Who knows what sort of lighting they used.

    You asked for opinions on the coin. Mine is that it merits a pass.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU58ish, dipped out = problem coin run

  • Options
    HigashiyamaHigashiyama Posts: 2,321 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m with the emerging consensus-a not particularly attractive AU58, though probably it would straight grade.

    Higashiyama
  • Options
    bfjohnsonbfjohnson Posts: 541 ✭✭✭

    Au 55 cleaned

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto Posts: 4,098 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bfjohnson said:
    Au 55 cleaned

    While not a fan of the half I would love to buy some of your coins based off your grading.

  • Options
    RayboRaybo Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TomB said:
    What kind of lighting was used for the images? Was it a fluorescent or ring light? I ask because the images are showing a really muted or low amount of luster and the surfaces "feel" soft. I'd guess anywhere from AU55 (for a true AU58 with very over-dipped surfaces) all the way up to MS62 (for a dipped, otherwise clean coin with mushy strike). I really can't get a handle on the surfaces, however, other than they are not original.

    The type of lighting has nothing to do with the results as long as the white balance is close to bring correct.
    OTOH, I agree that the surfaces are not original.

  • Options
    DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No expert but AU money seems right.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • Options
    MarkInDavisMarkInDavis Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭✭

    My first thought was 58.

    image Respectfully, Mark

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file