1918 D Quarter, FH?

Options

Attached is an image of a 1918D Quarter that is straight graded as an AU 50. Would you consider this to be a full head?

Comments

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    No

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzaf
    jmlanzaf Posts: 43,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Of course, it would help if you took a photo where you could clearly see the entire heat.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • PTVETTER
    PTVETTER Posts: 6,134 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I do not believe they put FH on quarters that are below MS60

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • oih82w8
    oih82w8 Posts: 13,208 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 16, 2020 4:46PM
    Options

    @PTVETTER said:
    I do not believe they put FH on quarters that are below MS60

    Yes, they do, especially Type I Standing Liberty quarter which has grades as low as AU50 in FH, Type II as well.

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 16, 2020 5:30PM
    Options

    Kinda looks like it could be but hard to tell from the pics.
    Also looks like 3 yards of dirt obscuring the luster and limiting the grade.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • Walkerguy21D
    Walkerguy21D Posts: 12,164 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Overall a very well struck specimen. The details on the shield are still quite sharp. I’m guessing it was FH when it was new. And it may be a tad bit under graded for the details, as clarkbar alluded to.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Trumbo
    Trumbo Posts: 107 ✭✭✭
    Options

    I don't think it's quite a fh, but I have seen an au53fh in a pcgs holder

  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Difficult to tell from that picture.... What I can see, says it is not FH....Generally, a low AU coin...Cheers, RickO

  • 291fifth
    291fifth Posts: 25,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    A very nice looking original coin. Enjoy it as it is and don't worry about some else's opinion as to FH or not. It is properly graded as AU50.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • mightyhunter
    mightyhunter Posts: 478 ✭✭✭
    Options

    A better head shot of the 1918 D.

  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    They don't get much fuller than that. And that is not 10 points worth of wear, its 5-8 points worth of dirt occluding the luster.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • Jimnight
    Jimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    :/

  • mightyhunter
    mightyhunter Posts: 478 ✭✭✭
    Options

    I didn't post this as a GTG post. Again, is it FH or not. According to Pop Reports at PCGS they have graded two as AU50FH and seven as 53FH. I think they missed the FH with this coin. I do disagree with the grade on this coin. Almost every AU 50 SLQ I have seen are washed out coins with a seriously worn leg on liberty. I usually avoid them. Because of the diminished luster on this coin, as a result of a serious case of originality (dirt), I would have graded it AU 53FH and perhaps AU 55FH on the right day. It is what it is and I like it just fine for my PCGS Registry Set. I snatched it up from Brian Greer when it appeared on his website years ago. Dipped out AU coins in PCGS plastic are a dime a dozen. Originality is scarce. Collect what you like and ignore the numbers. just sayin...mh

  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Just to reiterate, that is 100% a FH.

    my 2 cents - I would have conserved both of those slq prior to submitting, not a dip but removed the dirt, coins like that have nice original luster under them.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • jesbroken
    jesbroken Posts: 11,252 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Regardless, its a beauty and if you paid AU50 not FH price for that you got a steal. JMO
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file