Nothing quite says multi-million dollar coin like a screenshot indicating that a coin one grade higher set the price record back in 2004 at OVER $63,000!
and nothing says ridiculous like a member with 138 posts getting called out by a guy with 369 posts.
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
@CaliforniaKing. You feeling ok? Coin is legit, was recently for sale by a well known dealer, was purchased, and is not a multi-million dollar coin.
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
Did I miss something?
Wow, just wow!
Sometimes the drama follows a person around. Just take it as a complement and move on.
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
What are you talking about?
I’ve seen no hint of trolling and I don’t recall anyone in this thread talking about buying a multimillion dollar coin. I recommend that you carefully read all of the posts. And if you don’t don’t find solid evidence to support your accusation, you owe an apology.
You are right. I just assumed that that coin is expensive af. I am sorry to the OP for this comment.
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
What are you talking about?
I’ve seen no hint of trolling and I don’t recall anyone in this thread talking about buying a multimillion dollar coin. I recommend that you carefully read all of the posts. And if you don’t don’t find solid evidence to support your accusation, you owe an apology.
there are no multi million Trade dollars except maybe the finest 85 and even then in 2035 pricing. This is lower 5 figures. This post doesn't reek troll it reeks ALT
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
What are you talking about?
I’ve seen no hint of trolling and I don’t recall anyone in this thread talking about buying a multimillion dollar coin. I recommend that you carefully read all of the posts. And if you don’t don’t find solid evidence to support your accusation, you owe an apology.
You are right. I just assumed that that coin is expensive af. I am sorry to the OP for this comment.
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Looks like this is a troll, first off account was made fairly recently, and second of it's purchasing a multimillion dollar coin (probably). that's on the first page of coinfacts
What are you talking about?
I’ve seen no hint of trolling and I don’t recall anyone in this thread talking about buying a multimillion dollar coin. I recommend that you carefully read all of the posts. And if you don’t don’t find solid evidence to support your accusation, you owe an apology.
there are no multi million Trade dollars except maybe the finest 85 and even then in 2035 pricing. This is lower 5 figures. This post doesn't reek troll it reeks ALT
Unfair to delloy - his second finest is still worth multi millions...
@GiveMeProof said:
^^^^^^^^ sorry that was a test and I can't delete it. How is it done?
Click on the "gear" icon in the upper right corner of your post.
It allows you to Edit your post. You can't delete the post, but you can remove any of its contents.
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
The only other distinction I would make is 73-77 are found in both proof and circulation strikes whereas the 78-85 are proof only.
@GiveMeProof said:
^^^^^^^^ sorry that was a test and I can't delete it. How is it done?
Click on the "gear" icon in the upper right corner of your post.
It allows you to Edit your post. You can't delete the post, but you can remove any of its contents.
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
The only other distinction I would make is 73-77 are found in both proof and circulation strikes whereas the 78-85 are proof only.
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
The only other distinction I would make is 73-77 are found in both proof and circulation strikes whereas the 78-85 are proof only.
Excellent idea, I will go for an 1878 proof only.
Here's another idea. You have a nice 1873 Proof. Go out and get a matching 1873 Business Strike. That would be a very nice, significant two coin set. It's cool to contrast and compare the proofs and the MS coins.
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
The only other distinction I would make is 73-77 are found in both proof and circulation strikes whereas the 78-85 are proof only.
Excellent idea, I will go for an 1878 proof only.
Here's another idea. You have a nice 1873 Proof. Go out and get a matching 1873 Business Strike. That would be a very nice, significant two coin set. It's cool to contrast and compare the proofs and the MS coins.
I believe '73 was one of the years where the dies were re-used, so it's possible one could even find an MS coin that shares the same dies as the coin in the original post here. @Crypto correct me if I'm wrong on that.
@trueblood said:
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
The only other distinction I would make is 73-77 are found in both proof and circulation strikes whereas the 78-85 are proof only.
Excellent idea, I will go for an 1878 proof only.
Here's another idea. You have a nice 1873 Proof. Go out and get a matching 1873 Business Strike. That would be a very nice, significant two coin set. It's cool to contrast and compare the proofs and the MS coins.
I found you a 1878: It's at Pinnacle Rarities, and a tad expensive
@trueblood said:
Although a business strike sounds like it would make sense, I am too enamored with Proofs.
Your thinking is spot on. Proofs are always the best examples of a coin. And in many cases they sell for less than their MS counterparts. I have never understood this as I focus on almost exclusively proof coins in my collections.
The Pinnacle piece is amazing and also prohibitively expensive for my budget. I will have to find another, but thanks for the gazing opportunity. These cam designations and their accompanying premiums really irk me.
Comments
Nothing quite says multi-million dollar coin like a screenshot indicating that a coin one grade higher set the price record back in 2004 at OVER $63,000!
and nothing says ridiculous like a member with 138 posts getting called out by a guy with 369 posts.
Did I miss something?
Wow, just wow!
@CaliforniaKing. You feeling ok? Coin is legit, was recently for sale by a well known dealer, was purchased, and is not a multi-million dollar coin.
Maybe a few zeroes on your bank statement
Now here, is a true multi-million dollar Proof Trade Dollar....$3,960,000. to be exact. And it has flat stars to boot!
Sometimes the drama follows a person around. Just take it as a complement and move on.
GREAT COIN in a GREAT SERIES. The toning is very special and to my ungifted eye was not previously owned by ricko.
OINK
You are right. I just assumed that that coin is expensive af. I am sorry to the OP for this comment.
there are no multi million Trade dollars except maybe the finest 85 and even then in 2035 pricing. This is lower 5 figures. This post doesn't reek troll it reeks ALT
11.5$ Southern Dollars, The little “Big Easy” set
NP
its all good
I wanted to acquire another Proof Trade. Which year would be as significant as the first year? Obviously 1884 & 1885 are out of the picture......... photos will have to suffice.
TY
‘76 is a good year. Centennial and a few neat varieties.
Yes it is.
So it seems as if other than 1873, it would be a toss up, nothing that sticks out like the first year or am I wrong?
Unfair to delloy - his second finest is still worth multi millions...
!
^
Click on the "gear" icon in the upper right corner of your post.
It allows you to Edit your post. You can't delete the post, but you can remove any of its contents.
Maybe you can clarify what you mean by "sticks out".
All I was saying is it appears that the 1873 being first year is a no brainer year to obtain. The 1876 being the centennial as you mentioned also has many varieties to choose from. Is there another no brainer year or is that it for proof Trade Dollar series?
TY
I wish the 1895 Morgan Proof was priced a whole lot cheaper, that would be a great Proof to obtain.
The only other distinction I would make is 73-77 are found in both proof and circulation strikes whereas the 78-85 are proof only.
Thank you
Excellent idea, I will go for an 1878 proof only.
Here's another idea. You have a nice 1873 Proof. Go out and get a matching 1873 Business Strike. That would be a very nice, significant two coin set. It's cool to contrast and compare the proofs and the MS coins.
I believe '73 was one of the years where the dies were re-used, so it's possible one could even find an MS coin that shares the same dies as the coin in the original post here. @Crypto correct me if I'm wrong on that.
Although a business strike sounds like it would make sense, I am too enamored with Proofs.
great coin
www.paradimecoins.com - Specializing in Top Pop Type PCGS CAC coins. Subscribe To Our NEWPs Mailing List
Enamored with proofs you say? Welcome to the club!
I found you a 1878: It's at Pinnacle Rarities, and a tad expensive
Your thinking is spot on. Proofs are always the best examples of a coin. And in many cases they sell for less than their MS counterparts. I have never understood this as I focus on almost exclusively proof coins in my collections.
OINK
The Pinnacle piece is amazing and also prohibitively expensive for my budget. I will have to find another, but thanks for the gazing opportunity. These cam designations and their accompanying premiums really irk me.
Nice!
U.S. Type Set