Home U.S. Coin Forum

Is this one cleaned?

Inherited this coin, not an expert - wondering if it is clean / worthy of sending in for grading.

Thanks for your help!

Comments

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 36,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Obverse looks like it could have been cleaned. Need better photo.

    And for the love of god, do something about those staples before something gets scratched.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, evn when irrefutably accurate.

  • This content has been removed.
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,625 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What is the "T" beside the base upper left corner under the star? At least looks like a "T". Could this be counterfeit or just a photographic anomaly?
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,091 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks either environmentally damaged or counterfeit to me.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,824 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Shield rivets look too good. Don’t like the T. I would not be comfortable buying that coin.

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 10,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jesbroken said:
    What is the "T" beside the base upper left corner under the star? At least looks like a "T". Could this be counterfeit or just a photographic anomaly?
    Jim

    A new "Omega"?

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Wow, good eye jesbroken. This quarter was inherited by my dad in the mid-1970s and untouched since along with other coins I think are real. Cannot say I can explain the T!

  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Heck of a strike.

    I can't make heads or tails (ahem) from the pix. If you're unable to get good advice from someone you trust who has seen it first hand it might be worth submitting to PCGS.
    Lance.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,884 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you do send it in for grading, please let us know what the results are. This could be a real educational opportunity for all of us.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sorry, no help here.

  • Check this out! PCGS photograde, obverse of the AU58. I see a "T" in the exact same spot! Shield rivets strong there too.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinman999.... I have photograde up right now, with the AU58 magnified on my screen, and I do not see a T there... Cheers, RickO

  • Thanks RickO.

    Please look closer. It is not raised like the one in my example, and therefore a bit more subtle, but I see a distinct T, lighter than the surrounding field, in exactly the same spot on their 1917 AU58 example. Maybe just my eyes playing tricks on me ...

    https://www.pcgs.com/photograde#/SLQT1/Grades

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,625 ✭✭✭✭✭

    After looking at hundreds of 1917 SLQs in most grades, I have never noticed such a T or any other letter in this or any abnormal position. I do not see the T you are seeing in the Photograde AU58


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Thanks jesbroken, guess it's a fake! Will show this to my local coin dealer - he has been a collector / dealer for at least a few decades. Will let you all know if he has anything interesting to say about it. Appreciate all of the feedback, especially from you jesbroken. Pretty sure I would not have noticed the "T" on my own.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,946 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinman999 said:
    Thanks jesbroken, guess it's a fake! Will show this to my local coin dealer - he has been a collector / dealer for at least a few decades. Will let you all know if he has anything interesting to say about it. Appreciate all of the feedback, especially from you jesbroken. Pretty sure I would not have noticed the "T" on my own.

    I would not take it as a given that the coin is counterfeit.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,625 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As I stated, possibly a photographic anomaly. I owned an 1872 LSHD once that had an anomaly that appeared as the rear portion of an arrow until enlarged to find scratches. I see nothing that would attest to the coin being counterfeit other than the odd anomaly. I would have the coin graded by our hosts and truly know the answer, but that is just an opinion.
    Jim

    Here is the Half Dime I mentioned:

    and the enlargement:


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Wahoo554Wahoo554 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinman999 said:

    Thanks RickO.

    Please look closer. It is not raised like the one in my example, and therefore a bit more subtle, but I see a distinct T, lighter than the surrounding field, in exactly the same spot on their 1917 AU58 example. Maybe just my eyes playing tricks on me ...

    https://www.pcgs.com/photograde#/SLQT1/Grades

    I see the faint T you’re referring to in the AU58 as well.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,319 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It neither screams cleaned nor counterfeit to me. It does look AU, though. Full strike is typical for 1917 Type 1.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file