Home U.S. Coin Forum

The Lombra Factor

Saw this somewhere:

Professor Ray Lombra, of the Economics Department at Penn State University, has just completed another evaluation of data on the performance of rare American coins over the past 25 years. Previously, Professor Lombra had conducted a similar analysis for the Joint Committee on Taxation of the U.S. House and Senate.

Anyone have a link to this story/article?

Comments

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 5, 2020 1:29AM

    Lombra's presentation is available here:

    https://pcaginc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Lombra-Report.pdf

    Here's PCAG's marketing page on the report:

    https://pcaginc.com/the-lombra-report/

    The results were astonishing, over the last 33 years, high quality coins and stocks had the highest average annual returns. And at the same time, the annual returns on stocks, gold and coins were the most volatile.

    The Findings Suggested

    • Those holding stocks and coins were “rewarded” for bearing the extra risk thought to be associated with larger fluctuations in annual returns.

    • Statistical data from the last three decades shows that a portfolio that contains a modest portion of gold or rare coins will generally perform better than a portfolio that does not contain any.

    [...]
    2013 Findings
    [...]
    Over the best three-year period, Professor Lombra found that, far and away, rare gold was the place to be. High-end rare gold outperformed all other asset classes during their best three years.

    The best one-year performance vehicle data showed staggering results for rare coins… Nothing else came close.

    The Results Continue To Suggest That Over The Longer Run, Including Rare U.S. Coins Within An Existing Portfolio Could Improve Investment Performance.

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 5, 2020 2:33AM

    An independent study of the investment performance of gold and rare U.S. coins for the period January 1979 to December 2013.

    It's a 13 page PDF with some small tables and no graphs.
    The problem is that results are very dependent on the start and end points chosen.
    Results for the "best 3 years" or "best one-year" will favor volatile investments,
    and historic conditions which are not relevant to the current day.
    About as expected for paid research, I suppose.


    I like the "PCGS 3000" as an unbiased assessment of the rare coin market.
    The graph shows easily that if you start in 1979 you get a positive return,
    but if you start in, say, Nov. 1993, you get close to a zero return, depending on where you stop.
    https://www.pcgs.com/prices/coin-index/pcgs3000

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you for the links.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting study.... However, as with all studies, there are questions. Having spent the large portion of my career in areas that demanded study and statistics, I have a favorite line when someone quotes statistics.
    'Statistics are like a bikini, what they reveal is very revealing, what they conceal is vital.' ;) Cheers, RickO

  • TurtleCatTurtleCat Posts: 4,628 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m going to have to remember that one!

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,855 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 5, 2020 8:14PM

    I just refer to the PCGS 3000 for accurate / unbiased view for state of the market. Its all about timing. If from 1970 to 89 you made money. If after 89 a smash mouth buy low sell high slugfest to make any money. Probably 95 pct collectors lost money on latter period.

    Investor

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file