Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

NEWP 1933-S Walker for my set

ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

Happy Friday. I hope you all are well. I finally picked up a 1933-S for my Walker set that fit well. This just about completes my ‘30’s set.

GTG if you’d like. Have a great weekend.

Comments

  • Options
    OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice! I’m guessing AU-58?

  • Options
    amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm thinking 58 also.

  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,172 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58 looks right to me also.
    Though this date is normally pretty well struck, yours is exceptionally so, and I really like it!

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 10,003 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2020 3:40PM

    What they said. Edit, op photo almost looks like a different coin from the TV.

  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,995 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Im going with 62? 58+ possibly

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58 ... good looking coin!

  • Options
    CommencentsCommencents Posts: 349 ✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2020 5:51PM

    I say 62

  • Options
    segojasegoja Posts: 6,141 ✭✭✭✭

    58

    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • Options
    CommencentsCommencents Posts: 349 ✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:
    What they said. Edit, op photo almost looks like a different coin from the TV.

    Maybe it got hits in the grading room, lol

  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,394 ✭✭✭✭✭

    definitely 58.......VERY NICE EXAMPLE.

    Cheers to you!

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Options
    7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 8,021 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll go 63 and a nice conservative at that. I don't really understand the "58"s as the thigh line, chest & breast, head, her right arm and left thumb and hand quite nice sans wear.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,394 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 15, 2020 6:40PM

    @7Jaguars said:
    I'll go 63 and a nice conservative at that. I don't really understand the "58"s as the thigh line, chest & breast, head, her right arm and left thumb and hand quite nice sans wear.

    There is a dull line up the obverse center that indicates rub. Also, heavy chatter in the fields that is indicative of circulation. There is still some luster left. This coin is a real SLIDER and one that will fool a lot of people. Coins like this are the reason that we have Third Party Grading Services. It's a nice coin in any event.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,172 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @7Jaguars said:
    I'll go 63 and a nice conservative at that. I don't really understand the "58"s as the thigh line, chest & breast, head, her right arm and left thumb and hand quite nice sans wear.

    My guess is based mostly on the TrueView image of the reverse.
    Those central neck feathers show the rub pretty clearly, and that is an area that very seldom ever suffers from
    strike weakness.
    The OPs obverse image does indeed look like a 62 shot 63 coin....but I'm guessing that in hand, there is luster
    break in the right obverse field over the motto.
    But - I could certainly be wrong!

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 8,021 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I guess I am not seeing it (and admit it is not my series). The thigh of the leg looks excellent and better than most sans friction apparent and details of her RIGHT arm and hand are superb, partly as a result of the strike. Flatness at bottom of right forearm look to be striking softnesss. I guess my eyes must be failing me, but I don't see heavy chatter in the fields either; marks consistent with bagging but not heavy chatter - I have taken and seen many pictures of halfcrowns that ARE my area and they look frequently like this but in hand look much more like the PCGS photos which show only minimal field and device marking. Rims and edges look excellent and are many times a tiebreaker. Interesting what his reveal grade will be.

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • Options
    JBNJBN Posts: 2,009 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58+. Nice example of a tough date.

  • Options
    mvs7mvs7 Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll guess 58 as well. Nice example with great eye appeal!

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,223 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A well struck AU58!

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58+

  • Options
    ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good morning, thanks for the comments.

    Most were correct, It is an AU58, great eye you all have! Very slight wear up the center obverse and yes a bit of almost imperceivable chatter right obverse is what I’m guessing got it the grade. I’m happy to add it to the set. Thanks for looking :)

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I was going to guess AU58.... but got here ten minutes late... ;) Nice WLH...Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU55.

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 34,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Au58 nice coin

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...