Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Hypothetical Question about Crackouts

ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

Hypothetically, say you have a Gold Shield PCGS coin with Trueview images graded AU55 and you believe this coin to be MS or at least the very cool grade of AU58.

Say you decide to crack it out and try ATS to go for an AU 58 or higher grade. Just pretend the coin comes UNC details grade :s

Can you then crack it out again from the ATS slab and call PCGS and tell them you have a Gold Shield Coin with True View Images but you lost the plastic :D

Will PCGS grade the coin the same if the coin is in the exact state it was when it left PCGS?

I have never done this, just curious. I am considering trying one coin.

Also, it is the same coin, would it have the same cert number and photo?

My guess is no but I have not tried nor called.

Any experience with this?

Comments

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Figured, thank you.

    I just find it odd that an uncirculated large error coin dated 2019 comes back AU55. Odd grade as I know it has not circulated :o

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,753 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Figured, thank you.

    I just find it odd that an uncirculated large error coin dated 2019 comes back AU55. Odd grade as I know it has not circulated :o

    What’s odd about the fact that they have a different opinion than you do? In your first post, you even indicated that you thought it could grade less than 60.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Figured, thank you.

    I just find it odd that an uncirculated large error coin dated 2019 comes back AU55. Odd grade as I know it has not circulated :o

    I think some take the term "circulated", (or "uncirculated"), too literally. The graders are NOT trying to determine the life history of the coin. They are only grading "what it looks like".

    Maybe it got a rub going through a counting machine. Maybe it slipped across the shipping bag, or box. Whatever. "It never circulated in commerce" means nothing if it looks like it has wear.

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • Options
    blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It may come back details ATS, careful playing the crack-out game. But the Again, JA could always give it the gold star. It's all a gamble. If you spend enough money and send in enough chances are you will get the grade you are looking for. Congrats!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Once it is out of the slab, it is a raw coin....Knowing the history will not change the way it is treated at the TPG. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    Tom147Tom147 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    QUESTION What is ATS ?

  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,474 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Tom147 said:
    QUESTION What is ATS ?

    Across the street: NGC

  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,474 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    Tom147Tom147 Posts: 1,619 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you. ( I'm not allowed to cross the street )

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,191 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Playing the "opinion game" can get very expensive. Once a coin is cracked out the former "opinion" is null and void and that is as it should be. The "opinion" only existed as long as the coin was sealed in its plastic tomb.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Relooking at my raw photos, ya I guess it may have graded correctly based on the obverse images.

    I guess I found that fine line where an UNC coin grades AU55 as opposed to UNC Details grade :o

    I suppose it is a fair grade.

    I am Extremly happy with all my other grades on this submission including a 2016 MS63 triple struck Sheild Cent, Nicest MS Sheild Cent Major Error Known B)

    Here is the AU55 ...

  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That coin looks MS to my eyes. Look at the bands on that thing!!!!

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,753 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @erwindoc said:
    That coin looks MS to my eyes. Look at the bands on that thing!!!!

    Not to mine, based on the forehead, jaw, cheek and lower left neck areas.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @erwindoc said:
    That coin looks MS to my eyes. Look at the bands on that thing!!!!

    Not to mine, based on the forehead, jaw, cheek and lower left neck areas.

    Mark, I saw all that when I wrote my assessment. Im assuming that those are die polishing lines or planchet defects from an already destroyed planchet. Suppose they could be rub. Not much on the reverse to match up that is on the higher points of the design, but there is that cluster above the oak leaves. The OP thought it was MS as well. Guess that is why its hard to grade from pictures.

  • Options
    coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,487 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a nice parking lot coin.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Options
    blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like somebody having fun with the grinding wheel. PMD IMO.

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • Options
    DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @erwindoc said:
    That coin looks MS to my eyes. Look at the bands on that thing!!!!

    Not to mine, based on the forehead, jaw, cheek and lower left neck areas.

    I agree. But could all of those "lines" usually associated with circulation just be a result of the multi punching?

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DIMEMAN said:

    @MFeld said:

    @erwindoc said:
    That coin looks MS to my eyes. Look at the bands on that thing!!!!

    Not to mine, based on the forehead, jaw, cheek and lower left neck areas.

    I agree. But could all of those "lines" usually associated with circulation just be a result of the multi punching?

    Look at "Liberty" and "IGWT" and the Date and MM which are very clean on the last strike indicating struck on a damaged planchet perhaps which would make this a MS coin.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,753 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @erwindoc said:

    @MFeld said:

    @erwindoc said:
    That coin looks MS to my eyes. Look at the bands on that thing!!!!

    Not to mine, based on the forehead, jaw, cheek and lower left neck areas.

    Mark, I saw all that when I wrote my assessment. Im assuming that those are die polishing lines or planchet defects from an already destroyed planchet. Suppose they could be rub. Not much on the reverse to match up that is on the higher points of the design, but there is that cluster above the oak leaves. The OP thought it was MS as well. Guess that is why its hard to grade from pictures.

    Your assessment certainly might be correct. But if those areas aren’t as made, it could explain the sight-seen AU 55 grade that was assigned to the coin.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 14, 2020 4:10PM

    Then too bad so sad. You got stuffed in the backfield. Crackouts carry risk.

    Now your back to square 1. Worse yet you spent money gaining nothing. If you play crackout game you win some lose some. Accept that or its not for you.

    You need to accept responsibility for that risk.

    Specify a minimum grade on the form next time to avoid a downgrade, I play crackout, cross game to win not lose. Plus the money I am putting up has to be worth the potential gain / gamble risks. I am in the coin business make money not lose it on gambles.

    I don’t understand paying all that money for just 3 points on an AU coin. If upgrade was MV increase worth it?

    Leave as is.

    Investor

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file