2016 P Harpers Ferry Quarter

Comments

• mgary1117 Posts: 49 ✭

  May 2, 2020 6:13PM

  My apologies I didn’t send the pictures with my last post. Please look for “2016 P Harpers Ferry. Thank you.
  
  

  0
• RyGuy Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭

  May 2, 2020 6:21PM

  I think it is PMD, sorry.

  0
• mgary1117 Posts: 49 ✭

  May 2, 2020 6:27PM

  Thank you but I think I need better pictures. So people can see what I see. Bound and determined.

  0
• mgary1117 Posts: 49 ✭

  May 2, 2020 6:49PM

  Thank you but I think I need better pictures.

  0
• mgary1117 Posts: 49 ✭

  May 2, 2020 6:58PM

  
  

  0
• 291fifth Posts: 24,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 2, 2020 7:27PM

  Strictly environmental damage. No collector value or interest.

  All glory is fleeting.

  1
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 3, 2020 5:18AM

  @mgary1117.... Welcome aboard...That coin is environmentally damaged, totally Post Mint Damage....No numismatic premium.

  1
• FredWeinberg Posts: 5,930 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 3, 2020 6:37AM

  As mentioned it’s stained and environmentally damaged – not an error of any kind, we’re all sorry to say...

  Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.

  0
• Jimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 3, 2020 6:46AM

  Damaged.

  0
• JBK Posts: 16,487 ✭✭✭✭✭

  May 3, 2020 8:30AM

  ED. (Environmental Damage)

  If you think you have an error you should have an idea of how it supposedly happened during the minting process. Most odd looking coins got that way after they left the mint.

  But keep looking. Errors are out there.

  0