x
It may be an 1877, but that reverse won't allow it to straight grade.
Nope. Too much detail on reverse. No grade anyway.
I believe it will 'details' grade due to the marks on the reverse. Cheers, RickO
Too many large deep scratches on the reverse.
Collector Over 100 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 57 members and counting! instagram.com/klnumismatics
Might be a 75, with bad scratches, jmo.
I'm not sure that scratch would be forgiven even in that grade.
The N in ONE looks too bold to be a 77.
Wrong reverse, not an 1877. Look at the center crossbar in the EEs.
Here is an 1875 reverse followed by an 1877 compare them.
Very educational! Thanks guys!
Also looks like ebay pulled the listing. Saved me an pricey education on that one!
That's part of what we do here. We help.
Pete
Comments
It may be an 1877, but that reverse won't allow it to straight grade.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Nope. Too much detail on reverse. No grade anyway.
I believe it will 'details' grade due to the marks on the reverse. Cheers, RickO
Too many large deep scratches on the reverse.
Collector
Over 100 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 57 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics
Might be a 75, with bad scratches, jmo.
I'm not sure that scratch would be forgiven even in that grade.
The N in ONE looks too bold to be a 77.
Wrong reverse, not an 1877. Look at the center crossbar in the EEs.
Here is an 1875 reverse followed by an 1877 compare them.

Very educational! Thanks guys!
Also looks like ebay pulled the listing. Saved me an pricey education on that one!
That's part of what we do here. We help.
Pete