Home U.S. Coin Forum

I've had this Dime 30 years finally got a photo!

DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

Bought this coin raw in 1990 from DLRC. Time to get a photo of it. :) Comments are welcome as always.

Comments

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 17, 2020 11:32AM

    Very nice. My eyes must be deceiving me, I don't see an area of wear that gives this an AU-58 grade, I would've pegged this as an MS.

  • BigDowgieBigDowgie Posts: 1,780 ✭✭✭✭

    One man's AU58 is another man's MS63!

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,765 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice dime!

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well it is about time that you got a photo. :)

  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin!

  • No HeadlightsNo Headlights Posts: 2,105 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice!

  • DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just a perfect Type coin.

    I usually look at the fields when determining 58-63. Sure . . . high point wear is the obvious indicator, but for me, the microhits in the fields always give me a good indication in case other elements are tough.

    This has that light grayness and microhits in the field. You get those from carrying the dime around in a pocket for a day or two in 1910. Surely . . . almost MS63. Just not quite.

    Drunner

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice coin Jon... Amazing that you have had it for thirty years and just now taking a picture.... Do you think the mild chatter on the cheek caused the grade? Cheers, RickO

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,071 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That’s a real beaut buddy👍👍

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ernie11 said:
    Very nice. My eyes must be deceiving me, I don't see an area of wear that gives this an AU-58 grade, I would've pegged this as an MS.

    If you ever wish to see friction wear or even a very slight amount of "rub" on a silver coin, look at it under fluorescent light. That is one of the main reasons virtually every professional numismatist says NOT to use it for coin examination. Since 1972, I have used this type of light and also incandescent light whenever I have graded a coin.

    Fluorescent light is one reason true "Technical Grading" was so strict back when the definition of Uncirculated (MS) was NO TRACE OF WEAR. We could see the trace of wear and tell what caused it. Thankfully, grading is no longer that critical as there would not be enough Mint State coins around to satisfy the demand of picky collectors.

  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice, congratulations !!! :)

    Timbuk3

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file