Grade this REVERSE on this $20 Liberty

Comments

• asheland Posts: 23,784 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 9:20AM

  There are no hidden hairlines or marks. It’s really this nice.

  My YouTube Channel

  0
• asheland Posts: 23,784 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 9:26AM

  Another shot:
  

  My YouTube Channel

  1
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 9:29AM

  That is a great looking reverse on that gold...Looks 67/68. Cheers, RickO

  3
• 291fifth Posts: 24,710 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 9:30AM

  67

  All glory is fleeting.

  2
• asheland Posts: 23,784 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 9:49AM

  For the record, I gave it 66, but there are no wrong answers...

  My YouTube Channel

  3
• Tom147 Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 10:07AM

  67

  1
• Smudge Posts: 9,825 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 10:08AM

  66-67. Very clean for a large gold coin. I’ve got a feeling that there are some issues with the obverse.

  2
• asheland Posts: 23,784 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 11:12AM

  Here’s the obverse, probably a 63 in today’s grading:
  

  My YouTube Channel

  2
• Smudge Posts: 9,825 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 11:54AM

  That obverse is actually pretty nice.

  2
• No Headlights Posts: 2,106 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 12:01PM

  Many times I have heard and said I wish the obverse looked the reverse. My guess is that’s true with this coin. From the reverse I would say 66. Very nice

  1
• 09sVDB Posts: 2,420 ✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 12:08PM

  My first thought was 66

  1
• lkenefic Posts: 8,598 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 12:13PM

  Reverse. .. 67
  Obverse. ..63

  I think 62 is a bit harsh...

  Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;
  
  Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.

  2
• roadrunner Posts: 28,313 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 12:37PM edited March 24, 2020 12:38PM

  Slightly older holder so 62 might have been a tad harsh. But note rim bang at 1:00. Since there's only a $15 difference between 62 to 63 as of today. This is irrelevant.

  Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold

  2
• Jimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 12:47PM

  a little late on this one. Nice coin!

  1
• Downtown1974 Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 1:39PM

  That reverse is beautiful. Is this a new pick up @asheland?

  1
• mannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 1:55PM

  If I have to split the grade I would do it like this
  Obv 63
  Reverse 68
  Overall maybe 63/63+

  Beautiful reverse on that coin @asheland .

  1
• 50cCOMMEMGUY Posts: 211 ✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 3:52PM

  Obv 62/63
  Rev 67
  Overall=I’m not privy to the secret formula.

  "Today the crumbs, tomorrow the
  loaf. Perhaps someday the whole damn boulangerie." - fictional Jack Rackham

  1
• CharlotteDude Posts: 3,171 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 24, 2020 4:45PM

  That reverse is sweet... I would venture the obverse surfaces/cheek at MS-63, but the rim bruise at 12:30 probably "pushed it" to MS-62. The reverse looks at least MS-65.

  Got Crust....y gold?

  1
• asheland Posts: 23,784 ✭✭✭✭✭

  March 25, 2020 8:25AM

  @Downtown1974 said:
  That reverse is beautiful. Is this a new pick up @asheland?

  Actually no, it came through my work. A friend bought it...

  My YouTube Channel

  0