Last time I submitted one that looked that good they gave me a 64. I strongly feel all my Kennedy submissions are undergraded, and it is very disappointing, especially in the later years (2000-2019) where even a tiny mark makes a great 68 into a 66. Seems to me the grading standards (published by PCGS) for the newer coins are all shifted down the scale so you get very few 67 or 68's.
Congratulations on the liberal grade.. I am jealous.
Comments
63?
could be my 'puter but almost looks dipped
Hard to tell with the pictures but I’ll say 66.
although it is very well struck I will say MS65.
65
I want to say 66...
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
67
Collector, occasional seller
66
66
Looks hazy. For that reason, I'll guess 64. If it developed in the holder, the assigned may be higher.
Looks like a MS65 to me.....Cheers, RickO
65.
..
Wow, looks like I wasn’t too off!
Last time I submitted one that looked that good they gave me a 64. I strongly feel all my Kennedy submissions are undergraded, and it is very disappointing, especially in the later years (2000-2019) where even a tiny mark makes a great 68 into a 66. Seems to me the grading standards (published by PCGS) for the newer coins are all shifted down the scale so you get very few 67 or 68's.
Congratulations on the liberal grade.. I am jealous.