1926 P Standing Liberty Quarter

Comments

• coinbuf Posts: 12,052 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 1:55PM

  I would say MS64 no FH

  My Lincoln Registry
  My Collection of Old Holders
  
  Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.

  0
• Smudge Posts: 9,873 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 2:48PM

  55/58, no FH.

  0
• acloco Posts: 952 ✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 2:48PM

  Picture of reverse please.

  Successful BST transactions with: jp84, WaterSport, Stupid, tychojoe, Swampboy, dragon, Jkramer, savoyspecial, ajaan, tyedye, ProofCollection, Broadstruck x2, TwinTurbo, lordmarcovan, devious, bumanchu, AUandAG, Collectorcoins (2x), staircoins, messydesk, illini420, nolawyer (10x & counting), peaceman, bruggs, agentjim007, ElmerFusterpuck, WinLoseWin, RR, WaterSports, KeyLargRareCoins, LindeDad, Flatwoods, cucamongacoin, grote15, UtahCoin, NewParadigm, smokincoin, sawyerjosh x3

  0
• bcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 3:05PM

  

  0
• clarkbar04 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 4:36PM

  63FH

  MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.

  0
• bearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 5:26PM

  61 and no

  Ken

  0
• bcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 8:15PM

  

  0
• Kccoin Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 9:20PM

  good coin. looks just shy of fh from the pics

  1
• clarkbar04 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 11, 2020 9:50PM

  I don’t see anything missing for the FH designation. It’s not overly strong. I recently bought one in a 1920 ngc 63 old holder that was cracked and graded 64fh by pcgs.

  MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.

  0
• bcdeluxe Posts: 209 ✭✭✭

  February 12, 2020 6:26AM

  @clarkbar04 said:
  I don’t see anything missing for the FH designation. It’s not overly strong. I recently bought one in a 1920 ngc 63 old holder that was cracked and graded 64fh by pcgs.

  I agree with you. I think this meets the requirements of a minimal full head. 1926 isn't a tough year for FH coins, but it's also not among the easiest to find. I'm not sure what PCGS would give this coin, but I have seen many coins in NGC holders that lack an earhole or clear definition of the hairline. PCGS seems to be tougher on them, but even still, seems to allow some leeway on really tough issues to find in FH.

  0
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 12, 2020 6:26AM

  Looks close to FH... I was going to say 63....but got here late....Cheers, RickO

  0
• clarkbar04 Posts: 5,009 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 12, 2020 7:58AM

  @bcdeluxe said:

  I agree with you. I think this meets the requirements of a minimal full head. 1926 isn't a tough year for FH coins, but it's also not among the easiest to find. I'm not sure what PCGS would give this coin, but I have seen many coins in NGC holders that lack an earhole or clear definition of the hairline. PCGS seems to be tougher on them, but even still, seems to allow some leeway on really tough issues to find in FH.

  Hard to tell with those pics, if there is no friction on the knee and the luster is decent it could easily be a 64.

  I also agree with you on that last point, I've seen some SLQ in those holders I'd call deficient in the noggin for a FH designation with it noted on the label. The one you posted has an (albeit very small) earhole, full brow to hairline, and 3 distinct leaves.

  MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.

  0
• Unknown

  February 12, 2020 9:23AM

  This content has been removed.