If you could grade this Morgan...

I have an 1897o Morgan that I had sent in for restoration as it was artificially toned and I wanted to see if it could be restored. Unfortunately after restoration, it was still graded as questionable color. They did a great job on restoring it. My question to you all is if you could grade it yourself, what would you grade it other than questionable color? Sorry for such a large black background...not sure how to make it smaller.
1
Comments
Nice, it appears to have no hits on her cheek! That's key. I'll leave the rest for the more keener eye. To me, I Iike it.

Oh, second thought, I do see a couple of hits on her cheek. Sorry!
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.63-
Hopefully they were able to stabilize the surfaces so it doesn't turn back. Do you have any "before" pictures?
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
63 shot 64 no color.
I don't see any colors but I an slightly color blind. Before photo's would be interesting.
That graded QC?
Looks 64 to me.
I like it as a 64
I would grade this at a low 64, there is very little chatter visible in this picture. The color remaining is a problem though.
I have a raw Morgan that has been damaged bye a coin doctor (I bought it at melt). I looks like it had black or dark blue ink on it, it is also sticky to the touch.
I wonder if acetone might help remove this?
Fighting the Fight for 11 Years with the big "C" - Never Ever Give Up!
Member PCGS Open Forum board 2002 - 2006 (closed end of 2006) Current board since 2006 Successful trades with many members, over the past two decades, never a bad deal.
62, looks better Im sure than it did, ashame it wouldn't straight grade
I would like to see a before restoration shot as well
Here it is before restoration
Just posted before pics
It does have a nice strike for the year and mint mark. It IS genuine uncirculated. Maybe I should send to ANACS just for the grade.
MS62, due to subdued luster and the flat/rubby cheek on Ms. Liberty.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Yes. I was disappointed
Nice looking coin. 64
62ish, congrats!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
I would say 63.... may be a bit harsh due to the large images...every little tic and ding jumps out....Cheers, RickO
Probably a 63 from PCGS or NGC. Without the cheek hits it would be a solid 64
63 I agree with @CCGGG QC must still be the color they left on the reverse.
I really like it
63 big spread coin. If the grade doesn’t fit you must resubmit
63
The cheek hit is a sever downgrade. It's an MS 63 in my opinion as is.
62/62+
62
I think the cheek hits (prime focal area) prevent this piece from getting higher than a 63... IMHO...
FWIW... the conservation looks much better...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
At least 4 hits behind her upper lip.
I'd have left it alone if that pic is accurate.
That pic was NOT accurate when purchased. This is high res. Had option to return it but wanted to try the restoration.
Do you have the seller's pics?
Yes
Yes
58