Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Thoughts - these never released "rarities" that then sell for ridiculous amounts....

mt_mslamt_msla Posts: 815 ✭✭✭✭

I think they should go down in the recordbooks with an asterisk. And share the same amount of fame as patterns. Niche only.

Insert witicism here. [ xxx ]

Comments

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 42,987 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What "rarities" are we talking about? 1913 Liberty Nickels?

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,174 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1964 SMS Kennedy?

  • Options
    ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 20, 2020 9:02AM

    @jmlanzaf said:
    What "rarities" are we talking about? 1913 Liberty Nickels?

    That’ sure is a never released rarity but also #2 on the Top 100 Greatest Coins of All Time list. Is this what the OP is talking about?

  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,926 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You need to be more specific to make the question worthwhile.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 12,562 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Did some newbie hack your account? This is the kind of non specific question that newbies usually ask.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,752 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll play. Soooo - you say ignore 100-150 years of history to suit your own preferences. And where do you draw the line? 1885 trade dollars and 1913 liberty nickels certainly have more nefariousness about them than 1884 trade dollars and original 1804 dollars. Do you lump them in the same lot simply because they weren’t released? And what exactly does that mean, anyway??? The 1876-cc twenty centers were not released...but were legitimately struck. Were 1838-O halves ‘released’? How about 1870-S dollars? Kinda hard to tell but since you’re now setting the rules do enlighten us on your exact criteria so we know what to collect and what to ignore.

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,140 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What do you mean “never released?”

    1873-S No Arrows half dollar?

    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    ms70ms70 Posts: 13,958 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm guessing he's talking about moderns.

  • Options
    davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,976 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1944 steel cents?

  • Options
    Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1964 Peace dollar?
    1870-S $3
    What about the 2019-W dime? That may be one for sure,

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,733 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1933 Saint Gaudens double eagle.?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,756 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1927 Proof Buffalo Nickels? (The Sinnock Specials?)

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Options
    TurtleCatTurtleCat Posts: 4,692 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is interesting to wonder why a 1913 liberty nickel, for example, is not considered more like a pattern when it comes to pricing. I suppose it's popularity for one thing and marketing for another.

  • Options
    Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BuffaloIronTail said:
    1927 Proof Buffalo Nickels? (The Sinnock Specials?)

    Pete

    Didn't the TPGS "Experts" decide these were "specimens?"

  • Options
    bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :|

    Ken
  • Options
    BillDugan1959BillDugan1959 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinbuf I like your response and suggestion. I felt the same thing (account hacked) about another old timer's account this weekend.

  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,756 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @BuffaloIronTail said:
    1927 Proof Buffalo Nickels? (The Sinnock Specials?)

    Pete

    Didn't the TPGS "Experts" decide these were "specimens?"

    Proofs...............Specimens.............doesn't matter what they are. You are correct, though.

    They still fit the bill, IMHOP.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Options
    ElectricityElectricity Posts: 318 ✭✭✭✭

    They sell because the are “Unique” Thrill Seekers, Treasure hunters and Collectors are ALWAYS on the prowl... Get a bunch of these guys in the same room and the prices can go bananas

    The OP could possibly be talking about such coins as 1974 Aluminum Cent, Many were produced but never released for circulation.

    I read that a few escaped, possibly by mint employees hands or by Director Brooks

    Quite the paradox with some rarities, you really want to show them off... but run the risk of the confiscation, what to do?

  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,250 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Electricity said:
    They sell because the are “Unique” Thrill Seekers, Treasure hunters and Collectors are ALWAYS on the prowl... Get a bunch of these guys in the same room and the prices can go bananas

    The OP could possibly be talking about such coins as 1974 Aluminum Cent, Many were produced but never released for circulation.

    I read that a few escaped, possibly by mint employees hands or by Director Brooks

    Quite the paradox with some rarities, you really want to show them off... but run the risk of the confiscation, what to do?

    That what hold me back from showing my 1964 Peace dollar😉

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    mustangmanbobmustangmanbob Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭✭✭

    >

    That what hold me back from showing my 1964 Peace dollar😉

    Yeah, I thought I might be safe because my 1964 Peace dollar had a 1964-S cent accidently struck into the coin, so I figured it would OK, but I got a reading it might not be, so I keep it in the Eiger Sanction Vault.

  • Options
    mt_mslamt_msla Posts: 815 ✭✭✭✭

    Sorry no, not hacked account. Not present here very often anymore TBH.
    I was referring to this BS I found the other day is all ...
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/17/rare-coin-featuring-king-edward-viii-sells-for-1point3-million.html

    Insert witicism here. [ xxx ]

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    :/

  • Options
    amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's more legit(or is it?) than a 33 double eagle that sold for a few bucks more!

    @mt_msla said:
    Sorry no, not hacked account. Not present here very often anymore TBH.
    I was referring to this BS I found the other day is all ...
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/17/rare-coin-featuring-king-edward-viii-sells-for-1point3-million.html

  • Options
    mt_mslamt_msla Posts: 815 ✭✭✭✭

    @Rexford ok I guess if you say so.

    Insert witicism here. [ xxx ]

  • Options
    BillDugan1959BillDugan1959 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 26, 2020 12:06AM

    So why are you worried? That Edward VIII sovereign could not be owned for very long by anybody who didn't have a very solid net worth of say $100 million, with half of that in liquid assets. The coin is a very special coin that very few people could consider. In my sixty years, I have only met two people in that league (neither collected numismatic coins). The back story behind that coin is well-known, reasonable and believable too.

  • Options
    ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 26, 2020 12:22AM

    I was wondering if Tyrant purchased it but he already has one, so that accounts for the 2 specimens in private hands. Tyrant has a full 1937 Edward VIII proof set.

    Is there a published account of how the 2 in private hands got out?

  • Options
    BillDugan1959BillDugan1959 Posts: 3,821 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 26, 2020 12:18AM

    I believe that I read that "it was going back to England" in the sense that it had been in American hands and was going back into English hands. But not going to lay much of a bet - memory is tricky.

    In 2019 I went back to London for the first time in nine years. London has had an outstanding decade. New buildings all over. Many renovations and improvements.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file