Because of the masts, a sailing ship has a profile better suited to a coin than a battleship. That said, the Arizona in its glory would have been nice.
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
I've long been a supporter of placing John Paul Jones on a US coin. Aesthetically I prefer liberty but if we must have people then Jones is a natural. Not only his bravery and competence are worthy of commemoration but also his importance to the tactical and strategic battles that shaped the War of Independence. Now days bravery, competence, and success are hugely undervalued so I don't expect to see it.
Instead of just a John Paul Jones coin, I think it should be a 4-coin series as Robert Plant, Jimmy Page and John Bonham are also as deserving as John Paul Jones, if not more so.
As a follow-up, the folks in England recently "pardoned" JPJ. BTW the English have a very good sense of humor, I doubt the Hess joke would cause a stir then or today.
I really would prefer they not put people on coins....I much prefer art in various forms... or commemorating events of national significance. Cheers, RickO
Comments
HAHAHA that is hysterical I can only imagine the ideas that must be snuffed during fade moments in time.
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
Because of the masts, a sailing ship has a profile better suited to a coin than a battleship. That said, the Arizona in its glory would have been nice.
I've long been a supporter of placing John Paul Jones on a US coin. Aesthetically I prefer liberty but if we must have people then Jones is a natural. Not only his bravery and competence are worthy of commemoration but also his importance to the tactical and strategic battles that shaped the War of Independence. Now days bravery, competence, and success are hugely undervalued so I don't expect to see it.
That Hess joke would have people calling for his resignation in modern times.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
It's politically incorrect, isn't it.
Same problem for JPJ. Now days all that counts is talking a good game.
Instead of just a John Paul Jones coin, I think it should be a 4-coin series as Robert Plant, Jimmy Page and John Bonham are also as deserving as John Paul Jones, if not more so.
Michael Kittle Rare Coins --- 1908-S Indian Head Cent Grading Set --- No. 1 1909 Mint Set --- Kittlecoins on Facebook --- Long Beach Table 448
If we're gonna have a J.P. on a coin, it should be J.P. Morgan.
As a follow-up, the folks in England recently "pardoned" JPJ. BTW the English have a very good sense of humor, I doubt the Hess joke would cause a stir then or today.
J.P. Morgan on a Morgan
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I opened this thinking about this guy



instead of this guy.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
One is wearing a hat and the other is playing it....now which is which?
1941 was not the time to put John Paul Jones on a US coin.
I really would prefer they not put people on coins....I much prefer art in various forms... or commemorating events of national significance. Cheers, RickO
Did you know that John Paul Jones was at Waterloo?
I have his draft card to prove it:

Also, he has already appeared on a dime.
Play Money of American Children - by Richard and Wendy Clothier
http://rfc33.tripod.com/p25.jpg
Pacific Northwest Numismatic Association