45/50 detail, the surfaces have me a little puzzled, but it might be the holder that its in, or the lighting.
Regardless, you do not see many 21S walkers with this level of detail. Anything over VF detail is a respectable 21S.
I'm in the AU-50/53 camp. It's impossible to tell how much luster is still there with the lighting used to photograph the coin. If the luster is strong I could see a 55 tops.
Comments
That’s a real nice one.
AU 50.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
45/50 detail, the surfaces have me a little puzzled, but it might be the holder that its in, or the lighting.
Regardless, you do not see many 21S walkers with this level of detail. Anything over VF detail is a respectable 21S.
50.
AU 58
Looks 55, but in hand could be 58 depending on luster.
AU50 details. Need to lay it on a sunny windowsill for 6 months
55
53-55
50
55
AU53 Looks about right.
I'm in the AU-50/53 camp. It's impossible to tell how much luster is still there with the lighting used to photograph the coin. If the luster is strong I could see a 55 tops.
53 on the holder...
Although to me, it's a dipped-out 50.
Based on the picture... 53-55.... Still a nice '21...Cheers, RickO
Look like a 50 to me. Very nice circulated 21-S - most of them look like crap.
Au53
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Before PCGS - mail order UNC.
No, wait.... Still a mail order UNC in some practices.
AU55
My YouTube Channel
AU53