Some toned proof Jefferson 5¢'s and a "When is a cameo not a cameo?"
 of 4-17-04 004.jpg)
A few toned Jeff's, and a coin I thought was a slam dunk PR67CAM
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
1
Comments
Wow great colors!!! I like them a lot. Not sure why no cam on the last 51
https://www.autismforums.com/media/albums/acrylic-colors-by-rocco.291/
The 51 looks cam to me based on those pics. Send it back in. that's a good date in cameo
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
That's crazy. The 1951 is an easy CAM shot DCAM.
That's got to be an error on their part on the '51. Has to be a cameo. Nice color on the others!
And it's only $85 diff between the two grades, PR67 and Cam, not worth sending in again. And if you sell it as is, two months from now you'll see it in a Dcam holder.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
That '51 sure does look CAM.... in hand, maybe DCAM.... As they used to say 'Youse was robbed."...
Cheers, RickO
You'd think wouldn't you? In my opinion you got ripped on that one.
From that pic I'd have no issue paying cameo price for that 51 even though it isn't noted on the holder. Hopefully I'm not in the minority with that opinion.
Collector, occasional seller