Home U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • Batman23Batman23 Posts: 4,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am not an expert, but I would not grade that one at 68.

  • rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,630 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS68? With all those small cheek marks, I'd call it MS65 on a good day.

  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 3,580 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The reverse looks 68 ( maybe)

  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No way to tell if it's a technical 68 from those pics but who would buy it without seeing it in-hand unless they just want the cert number.

    The more you VAM..
  • ike126ike126 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66 tops IMHO

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sure does not look 68 in those pictures....and surely would not spend that much money on a coin that looks like that....Cheers, RickO

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,661 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice and clean, but 68 is tough to get.

  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

  • VanHalenVanHalen Posts: 4,257 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's a gorgeous coin. I couldn't offer a grade based on those images.

  • AblinkyAblinky Posts: 628 ✭✭✭

    I remember when the press release was announced for that coin being graded a few years ago.

    Andrew Blinkiewicz-Heritage

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Another common coin with pumped-up numbers.

    “I believe in intuitions and inspirations. I sometimes feel that I am right. I do not know that I am. When two expeditions of scientists, financed by the Royal Academy, went forth to test my theory of relativity, I was convinced that their conclusions would tally with my hypothesis. I was not surprised when the eclipse of May 29, 1919, confirmed my intuitions. I would have been surprised if I had been wrong.”

    “Then you trust more to your imagination than to your knowledge?”

    “I am enough of the artist to draw freely upon my imagination. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.”

    Albert Einstein- quoted in Saturday Evening Post interview (1929)

  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:
    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

    I think they do now as that allowed them to be CAC eligible again.

    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nope. No cigar - not with those cheek marks and reverse spots.

    Got Crust....y gold?
  • fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 922 ✭✭✭✭

    Company has carried lots of high end GSA coins years. That coin will sell.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,795 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 13, 2019 6:54PM

    Hard to tell anything from those pics..

  • AlexinPAAlexinPA Posts: 1,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What TONEDDDOLLARS said. :#

  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

    I think they do now as that allowed them to be CAC eligible again.

    Note on the reverse label states that they do not.

  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

    I think they do now as that allowed them to be CAC eligible again.

    Note on the reverse label states that they do not.

    That is an old band that was replaced a couple years ago. Here is the newer one.

    https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/661628/1882-CC-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-NGC-MS-62-GSA-Holder-Toned

    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

    I think they do now as that allowed them to be CAC eligible again.

    Note on the reverse label states that they do not.

    That is an old band that was replaced a couple years ago. Here is the newer one.

    https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/661628/1882-CC-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-NGC-MS-62-GSA-Holder-Toned

    Thank you for the follow up. Would the guarantee be retroactive to the earlier graded holders?

  • TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

    I think they do now as that allowed them to be CAC eligible again.

    Note on the reverse label states that they do not.

    That is an old band that was replaced a couple years ago. Here is the newer one.

    https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/661628/1882-CC-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-NGC-MS-62-GSA-Holder-Toned

    Thank you for the follow up. Would the guarantee be retroactive to the earlier graded holders?

    Yes it does

  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CharlotteDude said:
    Nope. No cigar - not with those cheek marks and reverse spots.

    I'm guessing those are toning interruptions and not contact marks, given the grade. Which is why, especially with those pics, nothing productive relative to the OPs inquiry can he accomplished here unless someone here either owns it or has seen it in-hand.

    The more you VAM..
  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 3,580 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bought one of my favorite coins from this seller. Saw it on ebay went to his site and saved $150. Price was good, not cheap but definitely not outrageous. What the heck...this coin.

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,051 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The pictures suck, especially for a $168k coin. Could be anywhere from 64 to 68 based on such shoddy images. If they are serious about selling it, they should have one of the leading coin photogs image it like Mark Goodman.

  • blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,933 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I may not count, but I have imaged it. It was for a different seller though.

    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • COINS MAKE CENTSCOINS MAKE CENTS Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow I dont see a 68 there but that's just my opinion

    New inventory added daily at Coins Make Cents
    HAPPY COLLECTING


  • ColonialcoinColonialcoin Posts: 711 ✭✭✭✭

    @COINS MAKE CENTS said:
    Wow I dont see a 68 there but that's just my opinion

    Oh, the 68 is there all right, as in $168,000+!! Yikes! ;)

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,661 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unless you are just looking for bragging rights, just get a nice 66 ( which that may be ) and buy lots of other nice coins.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,491 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seems like a serious stretch to call that a 68. Not nice toning in my opinion. :(

  • nagsnags Posts: 819 ✭✭✭✭

    I like his 1884 MS67 DMPL better. He has a lot of great GSA's listed

  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinstartled said:

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:

    @blu62vette said:

    @Coinstartled said:
    Reminds me of a similarly toned 85-CC graded MS68.

    NGC as I recall does not guarantee the grades in GSA plastic.

    I think they do now as that allowed them to be CAC eligible again.

    Note on the reverse label states that they do not.

    That is an old band that was replaced a couple years ago. Here is the newer one.

    https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/661628/1882-CC-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-NGC-MS-62-GSA-Holder-Toned

    Thank you for the follow up. Would the guarantee be retroactive to the earlier graded holders?

    Numismatic Guaranty Corporation® (NGC®) has announced that its comprehensive guarantee of grade and authenticity has been expanded to cover GSA Hoard Morgan Dollars that have been graded by NGC in their original black GSA holders. This update will be applied retroactively to include all NGC-certified GSA Morgan Dollars and will supersede the language on the back of the NGC GSA certification label.

    https://www.ngccoin.com/news/article/3527/NGC-Guarantee/

  • CCGGGCCGGG Posts: 1,267 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Poor eye appeal (tarnish/toning and scratches) of the obv is enough to say it's not a 68.. Probably a 65 from what I can see in the pictures. The rev is much better.. That's possibly a 67 or 68.

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,051 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CharlotteDude said:
    Nope. No cigar - not with those cheek marks and reverse spots.

    Those could be toning breaks. I don't think NGC would overgrade by 4 grading points, and at least 2 graders there felt MS68 was appropriate. Would be interesting to see BluCC's photos, but he probably cannot share them unless they were in a public for sale listing.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,795 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have invoked their grading guarantee on some coins, I would be interested to know if they have ever paid out on GSAs certified by them? When you get up to MS66 and above coins the grading services are a lot more careful usually.

  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you're asking a fortune for a coin maybe spending $10 on professional imaging should be a thing....

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • OuthaulOuthaul Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DollarAfterDollar said:
    If you're asking a fortune for a coin maybe spending $10 on professional imaging should be a thing....

    BINGOOOOOOoooooooo!

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If only people actually realized that there’s no way they can accurately make such pronouncements off those images. Sigh

  • TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:
    If only people actually realized that there’s no way they can accurately make such pronouncements off those images. Sigh

    I said this earlier but many think they can do it. Certainly better than me

  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not only it's sooooo expensive ...... I don't see 68 there ;)


  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2019 11:44AM

    @robec can definitely come up with superior pictures to at least justify the asking price ;)

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    pass

  • dmwestdmwest Posts: 959 ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2019 2:48PM

    It's a PCGS 66+.

    Don't quote me on that.

  • TONEDDOLLARSTONEDDOLLARS Posts: 2,928 ✭✭✭✭

    Talk about drinking the koolaide

  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 15, 2019 5:11PM

    __> @CharlotteDude said:

    Nope. No cigar - not with those cheek marks and reverse spots.

    For anyone who questions "grading by the images provided" -- Isn't that what the OP requested in the first place? That's exactly what was provided... by me anyway... an opinion, based on the images provided. If there's an expectation to offer a solid, no questions asked grade about the coin, then by all means, offer better images. Obviously, the "pronouncements" might change if other images were provided, or even better, if the coin could be viewed in hand.

    Got Crust....y gold?
  • cnncoinscnncoins Posts: 414 ✭✭✭✭

    Impossible to accurately grade from the photos...seems like bad value at 168K regardless IMHO

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CharlotteDude said:
    __> @CharlotteDude said:

    Nope. No cigar - not with those cheek marks and reverse spots.

    For anyone who questions "grading by the images provided" -- Isn't that what the OP requested in the first place? That's exactly what was provided... by me anyway... an opinion, based on the images provided. If there's an expectation to offer a solid, no questions asked grade about the coin, then by all means, offer better images. Obviously, the "pronouncements" might change if other images were provided, or even better, if the coin could be viewed in hand.

    Would you jump off a bridge of your friends (OP) requested you to?

    ;)

  • santinidollarsantinidollar Posts: 1,056 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Grading off a picture is tough enough. Add toning and it’s a big pass for me.

  • CharlotteDudeCharlotteDude Posts: 3,116 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @CharlotteDude said:
    __> @CharlotteDude said:

    Nope. No cigar - not with those cheek marks and reverse spots.

    For anyone who questions "grading by the images provided" -- Isn't that what the OP requested in the first place? That's exactly what was provided... by me anyway... an opinion, based on the images provided. If there's an expectation to offer a solid, no questions asked grade about the coin, then by all means, offer better images. Obviously, the "pronouncements" might change if other images were provided, or even better, if the coin could be viewed in hand.

    Would you jump off a bridge of your friends (OP) requested you to?

    ;)

    Depends on the bridge, but yes; been there, done that. ;-)

    Got Crust....y gold?
  • This content has been removed.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file