Home U.S. Coin Forum

ANA Grading Standards - First Draft Edition 1977 - MS66, 67, 68. 69 a big No No. MS70 ok.

RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

ANA President Virgil Hancock appointed Abe Kosoff as Grading Chairman of a panel to create the first Official Grading Standards for U.S Coins for the ANA. The first draft edition was completed in 1977 after two years of work. Kosoff said that a perfect solution to the problem is next to impossible, but he was convinced that a workable solution was at hand.

Here is the resultant grading scale the panel came up with:

Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.

Comments

  • DavideoDavideo Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭

    I love the MS-66 to MS-69 description. So essentially they are to be used by charlatans and hucksters.

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Ronyahski

    Thanks for this information.

    Even in the beginning of setting a grading standard the grades of 66-69 were seemingly pointless. But it seems like they compressed what could have been 66s, 67p, 68m, and 69d into subsets of 70.

    Who was on the panel?

  • AlexinPAAlexinPA Posts: 1,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very interesting piece of history, thanks.

  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 27, 2018 4:58AM

    @Ronyahski
    Very interesting ... what is the source of the page?

    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • CCGGGCCGGG Posts: 1,267 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 27, 2018 5:45AM

    I've never seen this before thanks for sharing. I find it interesting that they wanted to discourage the use of the 66 thru 69 grades. I can usually see the difference pretty easily between a 65 and 66/67 coin. There's not nearly as many 68/69's out there to judge from. And of course there's a lot of money differences in these grade ranges with many coins,

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The MS70 categories are interesting... clearly an attempt to categorize minor variations of an almost perfect coin. The entire document demonstrates the difficulties in assigning grades when clearly the written definitions are based on opinion. Once an opinion is advanced, the discussion - based around dissenting opinions - begins. It goes on here on the forum every day. Cheers, RickO

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Ronyahski said:
    ANA President Virgil Hancock appointed Abe Kosoff as Grading Chairman of a panel to create the first Official Grading Standards for U.S Coins for the ANA. The first draft edition was completed in 1977 after two years of work. Kosoff said that a perfect solution to the problem is next to impossible, but he was convinced that a workable solution was at hand.

    Here is the resultant grading scale the panel came up with:

    Obviously this draft version was never adopted. I have never seen it before. BTW, the standards were presented to the Board at the 1976 ANA convention in New York and published in 1977.

    ANA President Virginia Culver first asked Abe to work on the grading standards in 1973, but I don't know if much got done before Virgil re-appointed him at the 1975 convention in LA. Virgil could be very gung-ho at times.

    Can you please send me a scan of the entire document?

    TD

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 27, 2018 6:29PM

    @Hemispherical said:
    @Ronyahski

    Thanks for this information.

    Even in the beginning of setting a grading standard the grades of 66-69 were seemingly pointless. But it seems like they compressed what could have been 66s, 67p, 68m, and 69d into subsets of 70.

    Who was on the panel?

    Not sure if they ever published the names of panel members, or even had an "official" panel. When ANA first started with authentication services in the early 1970's the authenticator's names were secret.

    Definitely some of the catalysts behind the ANA push to create a grading standard: Eric Newman, Harvey Stack, Stanley Apfelbaum, Virgil Hancock. It seems that Kosoff took the ball a lot and ran with it.

    Back in 1907 the ANA appointed a committee to study the possibility of establishing grading standards. Henry Chapman of Philadelphia was the chairman of that group. The group worked for over two years and came back with their report, "Impossible!"

    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks @Ronyahski

  • StaircoinsStaircoins Posts: 2,579 ✭✭✭

    Interesting to see the EF vs XF debate occurring then as now.

  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @astrorat said:
    @Ronyahski
    Very interesting ... what is the source of the page?

    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • RonyahskiRonyahski Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CaptHenway said:

    @Ronyahski said:
    ANA President Virgil Hancock appointed Abe Kosoff as Grading Chairman of a panel to create the first Official Grading Standards for U.S Coins for the ANA. The first draft edition was completed in 1977 after two years of work. Kosoff said that a perfect solution to the problem is next to impossible, but he was convinced that a workable solution was at hand.

    Here is the resultant grading scale the panel came up with:

    Obviously this draft version was never adopted. I have never seen it before. BTW, the standards were presented to the Board at the 1976 ANA convention in New York and published in 1977.

    ANA President Virginia Culver first asked Abe to work on the grading standards in 1973, but I don't know if much got done before Virgil re-appointed him at the 1975 convention in LA. Virgil could be very gung-ho at times.

    Can you please send me a scan of the entire document?

    TD

    Capt, you'd know better than any of us, but you sure about your dates above? The Kosoff report was the 1st edition, which was not completed until 1977. Wasn't ANA just organizing efforts in 1975-1976? They just formed the grading board and I think they named Pittman as the first chairman.

    Anyway, please PM me with your email, and I'll try to send you a copy of Kosoff's report.

    Some refer to overgraded slabs as Coffins. I like to think of them as Happy Coins.
  • hchcoinhchcoin Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is why I love this forum. You just never know what you are going to read when you open a thread. This one exceeded my expectations.

  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Ronyahski said:

    @astrorat said:
    @Ronyahski
    Very interesting ... what is the source of the page?

    Thank you!

    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 27, 2018 8:23PM

    Interesting draft. Notice the many revisions before publication.

    As proposed the "MS 70" category was DOA. I don't believe Kosoff was the right person to do this - too many deals and skeletons. Frank Katen and some others had a clearer, more balanced concept, but they were not welcome in the event.

    Excellent find!

  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @hchcoin said:
    This is why I love this forum. You just never know what you are going to read when you open a thread. This one exceeded my expectations.

    Absolutely agree!

  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 28, 2018 8:20AM

    Guidelines is a better word than Standards.
    When it's an opinion, one is free to use the whole numberline instead of leaping from 65 to 70. There are now enough certified (and stickered) coins on the market (and in online archives, which didn't exist until recently) to serve as benchmarks.

    You and i may dispute whether a hotel or movie gets 4 or 5 stars, but we ought to agree with the difference between that one and one that only earns 1 or 2 stars. We might even agree, after comparing notes on other hotels, that 4 1/2 stars makes the most sense for this particular one.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The first Grading Roundtable was held at Stacks in NYC. It took place while I was still at ANACS so pre 1976. I told the assemblage that ANACS could start grading coins immediately as I had devised a technical grading system (not the so-called one used in CO when they moved) for our internal records that had been in use for a few years already.

    I don't remember everyone at the Roundtable except for Kossoff, Stack, Bowers, Loring, Hoskins, Affelbaum, Klineman (Sp), and possibly Newman and Breen.

    While it was all we had and a necessary start, unfortunately, the final product (ANA Grading Guide) was written by a committee and you know how that works out. :(

  • atomatom Posts: 466 ✭✭✭✭

    Perhaps 50 years from now we'll have a hybrid coin-slab grading system: a perfectly-consistent dynamic scientific scan (by means of the then equivalent of today's smartphone app) which will calculate a new point total based on the coin within the slab - considering all of the coin's attributes, plus the physical condition of the slab (scratches and abrasions, etc.), along with the hybrid coin-slab pedigree data and true rarity based on decades of historical sales appearance.

  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very interesting.

    Plenty of typos.

    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • HemisphericalHemispherical Posts: 9,370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wish I could embed a tag to this thread for easier searching (from other devices) when it gets buried.

    Makeshift tag.

    Grading. ANA. 1977. Kosoff. 70d. 70m. 70p. 70s. Official Grading Standards. Coins. Document.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file