Home U.S. Coin Forum

The Ninth 1934-S MS67 WLH

JBNJBN Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭✭✭

From 5 in 2007, 6 in 2012, 7 in 2013, 8 in 2015, now we have the ninth 34-S in 67:

The half dollar is up for auction later this year:
https://coins.ha.com/itm/walking-liberty-half-dollars/half-dollars/1934-s-50c-ms67-pcgs-secure/p/1281-1521.s?ic4=ListView-Thumbnail-071515

Competition for this piece will be interesting.

Comments

  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,750 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 10, 2018 10:01PM

    The right facing field above the motto looks clean but I do not like the slight central weakness and the chatter on the center skirt lines. Also, not sure what I think of that small dark spot on the left facing side of the skirt lines. Luster could be a bit better, too. If I were looking for a 67; I would pass on this one.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,718 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice, but I have to wonder if this was a former 66 or 66+ that was submitted a number of times....

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 7,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That skirt spot would be a deal killer for me.

    Seated Half Society member #38
    "Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,618 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This coin as listed on coin facts along with 2 others would be my choice of the three, but at the value claimed, I would pass.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin, however, the spot on the skirt and the rim ding make me question a 67...Cheers, RickO

  • JBNJBN Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jesbroken said:
    This coin as listed on coin facts along with 2 others would be my choice of the three, but at the value claimed, I would pass.
    Jim

    If you select the view all images, you'll see TV images for 7 of the 67s.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,090 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice value bump. This exact coin had previously been graded MS66 and MS66+.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is a 1934S folks. Beauty!

    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    Nice coin, however, the spot on the skirt and the rim ding make me question a 67...Cheers, RickO

    Rim ding?

    thefinn
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rim ding... five o'clock obverse... Cheers, RickO

  • This content has been removed.
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,148 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow,
    That huge obverse depression on the skirt right near the sun is an obvious problem that normally should keep this coin out of a 67 grade along with the above mentioned spot and the very very light graze in the dreaded right field.

    I recently bought an 1918-D walker in PCGS/CAC MS-65 at a Legend Auction that I believe is virtually the equal of this 1934-S.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,148 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A second look at this 1934-S walker draws my eye to two additional MS-66 limiting issues which includes grazing on the high point of the left leg as well as the left hand below the thumb. Do not get me wrong, it is still a very pretty coin but looks like a MS-66 to me.
    Furthermore, I noticed that it has not been CAC stickered (yet) and would highly doubt if it received a sticker.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 12, 2018 8:30PM

    @oreville said:
    Wow,
    That huge obverse depression on the skirt right near the sun is an obvious problem that normally should keep this coin out of a 67 grade along with the above mentioned spot and the very very light graze in the dreaded right field.

    I recently bought an 1918-D walker in PCGS/CAC MS-65 at a Legend Auction that I believe is virtually the equal of this 1934-S.

    Holy crow, I thought PCGS was tightening, not loosening! If I submitted that coin tomorrow it would be graded "Unc Details - Machine Damage" for the depression in the skirt.

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,205 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rim ding???
    Depression on the skirt???

    Apparently, I’m just not seeing the same coin...

  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,148 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 12, 2018 8:56PM

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Rim ding???
    Depression on the skirt???

    Apparently, I’m just not seeing the same coin...

    I do not see any rim ding either. there is too much chatter in the left hand below rhe thumb as well as on the high point of the leg and there appears to be a depression on the skirt right next to the sun which is next to the cut in the skirt. Or am I imagining the depression there?

    But I do not fault PCGS for relenting to a MS-67 grade as it is an attractive coin for sure but I am old school and still am into technical grading. But it must be a just "made the grade" which I will pass on.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'd be willing to guess that there are not actually 9 in this grade.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • JBNJBN Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DollarAfterDollar said:
    I'd be willing to guess that there are not actually 9 in this grade.

    There are nine examples. I keep track of the top pops and all nine cert numbers are 'active'.

  • JBNJBN Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sold for 15K ($18K total).

  • batumibatumi Posts: 863 ✭✭✭✭

    Nicem clean coin. I sure dont like those carbon? spots. I have noticed these spots of late on several high graded coins. They appear like they are dug into the surface, and may still be active. I have no idea what may cause these other than an incomplete rinse after dipping. I would guess they form after being slabbed, but anyhow, I am leery when I see them.

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,270 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yup that ketchup stain on the skirt...honey where's the zout! Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file