Home U.S. Coin Forum

half disme sold for 2 Mio USD

anybody knows about "The Dazzling Rarities collection" that bought this coin ?

http://www.coinnews.net/2018/09/24/1792-half-disme-sold-for-record-price/

«1

Comments

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,996 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 25, 2018 3:31PM

    I saw it on display at several ANA shows. Super coin!

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,205 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats to all involved

  • ms70ms70 Posts: 13,956 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 25, 2018 3:50PM

    What's a "mio"? Is that some sort of secret U.S. currency?

    Either way, it's gorgeous!

    Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.

  • robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭

    I’m of the opinion that the coin market in general, and top end rarities in particular, are spectacularly undervalued. $2 Million is a bargain price. Especially in the context of comparing numismatic rarities vs say, art, or even very niche collectible categories, there’s a lot of upside for numismatics.

  • mrearlygoldmrearlygold Posts: 17,858 ✭✭✭

    Great coin, congratulations

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,205 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 25, 2018 4:00PM

    Absolutely agree. The 1913 was a stunning bargain at less than I had sold it for over 11 years ago. Same for the 1804$1 (at over a million less than I had offered about the same time period).

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭✭✭

    maybe it sold in-house for some free press release PR

  • @davewesen said:
    maybe it sold in-house for some free press release PR

    Debbie Downer

  • This content has been removed.
  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What did the black rectangles sell for?

    (Nice coin ! BTW)

  • That is a beautiful piece of history, but I don't even know how to say disme.

    Successful BST deals with mustangt and jesbroken. Now EVERYTHING is for sale.

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,205 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Same as dime

  • This content has been removed.
  • northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Same as dime

    ... or deme as in seem?

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 25, 2018 10:49PM

    Nice Wayte Raymond album toning.

    Great provenance including:

    • David Rittenhouse
    • Henry Chapman
    • George L. Tilden
    • Thomas Elder
    • Jay Parrino
    • Knoxville Collection
    • Steve Contursi
    • Cardinal Collection

    David Rittenhouse, first director of the United States Mint; Rittenhouse family, kept within the family by Rittenhouse's descendants from July 1792 until - Henry Chapman 10/1919:249, $56 - George L. Tilden - Thomas Elder 6/1921:2029, $62 - private collector, who apparently stored the coin in a Wayte Raymond album - unnamed museum in New England - Stack's 10/1988:536, $68,750 - unknown intermediaries - dealer Jay Parrino, early 1990s, as agent for the anonymous "Knoxville Collection," early 1990s to 2003 - private collector, 2003 to January 2007 - Steve Contursi - Cardinal Collection, acquired for $1,500,000 in 2007 - Stack's/Bowers 1/2013:13093, $1,145,625

    More: http://www.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/11020

  • This content has been removed.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 25, 2018 10:51PM

    @cardinal's website has some great info on this coin along with an earlier photo when it was a NGC MS68.

    http://www.ccefdn.org/1792halfdisme.htm

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 25, 2018 10:56PM

    @afford said:
    With regards to the pedigree, Only the first 4 are meaningful in my book.

    @cardinal is meaningful in mine :)

    So is Wayte Raymond ;)

  • SmEagle1795SmEagle1795 Posts: 2,199 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If this coin is indicative of the quality of the other holdings in the "Dazzling Rarities" collection, then it will undoubtedly be a sight to see.

    Learn about our world's shared history told through the first millennium of coinage: Colosseo Collection
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:
    With regards to the pedigree, Only the first 4 are meaningful in my book.

    I disagree. Cardinal would also mean a lot to me.

  • ColonialcoinColonialcoin Posts: 743 ✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:
    With regards to the pedigree, Only the first 4 are meaningful in my book.

    That’s such a great coin! I wish my name was part of the pedigree! ;)

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is an amazing coin.... Interesting provenance as well.... certainly well preserved. Cheers, RickO

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,765 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What an excellent coin!!

  • JohnFJohnF Posts: 340 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All pedigree is meaningful IMO. Great coin. Congrats to the new owner!

    John Feigenbaum
    Whitman Brands: President/CEO (www.greysheet.com; www.whitman.com)
    PNG: Executive Director (www.pngdealers.org)
  • GazesGazes Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @privaterarecoincollector said:
    anybody knows about "The Dazzling Rarities collection" that bought this coin ?

    http://www.coinnews.net/2018/09/24/1792-half-disme-sold-for-record-price/

    going back to the OP---is this the first time this collection has ever been mentioned?

  • This content has been removed.
  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:

    @MrEureka said:

    @afford said:
    With regards to the pedigree, Only the first 4 are meaningful in my book.

    I can understand feeling that way. I can’t imagine any good reason for posting it.

    I don't believe in pedigrees that are of modern times or modern collectors, the is all. Nothing personal. I only look for the older pedigrees like I only collect the classics and not the moderns.

    I get it, more or less. (Although I don't really understand what it means to "believe" in a pedigree.) Anyway, the provenance is what it is.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • This content has been removed.
  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 26, 2018 5:54PM

    @afford said:
    I would think it could affect all the 1792's under this one value rise. Said h10c jumped almost $500k which is a huge percentage. So it would go to assume that every other lower graded h10c would increase in value too.
    Comments?

    This is a one-off of the highest graded/finest-known. I see little chance of a slip-steam effect on values. Grungy CAC 65's and below will not prosper to any degree based on this singularity :)

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • This content has been removed.
  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:
    Whether the provenance is:
    Jat Parino
    Knoxville Collection
    Steve Contours
    Cardinal Collection
    Mr eureka
    Afford
    I don't care, I don't believe in the importance of these previous owners i.e. pedigrees.

    Well, I care about the Afford pedigree. I like your engraved coins ;)

  • northcoinnorthcoin Posts: 4,987 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 26, 2018 11:45PM

    northcoin Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭✭ September 25, 2018 9:30PM

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Same as dime

    ... or deme as in seem?

    @BryceM said:
    As far as pronunciation, disme is the Old French word which means tithe, or one-tenth. In Latin, decima was basically the same thing (decimate = punish every 10th man or a tax of 10%). In French, it is pronounced deem, which rhymes with seam. In modern French, it is spelled dîme (the little hat signifies an 's' was removed) but is pronounced the same. In colonial times, there was plenty of French influence and I'm not sure the pronunciation was universally standardized. Spelling of most words wasn't standardized until relatively modern times.

    Thanks for confirming.

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:

    @MrEureka said:

    @afford said:

    @MrEureka said:

    @afford said:
    With regards to the pedigree, Only the first 4 are meaningful in my book.

    I can understand feeling that way. I can’t imagine any good reason for posting it.

    I don't believe in pedigrees that are of modern times or modern collectors, the is all. Nothing personal. I only look for the older pedigrees like I only collect the classics and not the moderns.

    I get it, more or less. (Although I don't really understand what it means to "believe" in a pedigree.) Anyway, the provenance is what it is.

    Whether the provenance is:
    Jat Parino
    Knoxville Collection
    Steve Contours
    Cardinal Collection
    Mr eureka
    Afford
    I don't care, I don't believe in the importance of these previous owners i.e. pedigrees. I believe in the importance of pedigree of the following individuals:
    David Rittenhouse (phenomenal pedigree for an individual of such importance to numismatics))
    Thomas Elder (notable pedigree for a dealer)
    Henry Chapman (notable pedigree for a dealer)
    George L. Tilden (Note I am unfamiliar with the man, read about his collection being sold in 1921 by Elder)

    First, I hate hijacking this thread to discuss the subject, but I want to clarify a point. Please allow me to post one last thought on this and then, if you want to take it further, start a new thread on "the value of names in a provenance".

    If I understand Afford, he is not really saying that the names of more recent owners are not "important" in the sense that we shouldn't include these names in a provenance, or that it's not worth knowing the names. He's saying, I think, that the names don't add value or prestige to the coins. I concede that there's some truth to that, but it's more a function of human nature - we're less likely to revere our contemporaries than historical figures - than careful analysis. But the truth is that knowing that a coin was chosen for the Knoxville or Cardinal collection tells us something about the coin, and the coin tells us something about the collector. These things do matter to some of us.

    BTW, I mentioned Knoxville or Cardinal and not the dealers because virtually all dealers handle many completely ordinary things "just for the money". But if Jay Parrino put a coin in one of his trophy-coin catalogs, or if Steve Contursi took a coin on a promotional tour for five years to promote it, his company and numismatics, or if I put the coin in my own personal collection for 20 years, our names in those particular provenances would mean something more than usual.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @afford said:
    Hey Col, yah think this little lassie will appreciate at all, it is also pedigreed..........pedigreed to Daniel W. Valentine...his plate coin.

    Actually, I've owned more messed up half dismes than healthy ones. I've actually seen the "Cripple Creek" domain strengthen in price over the last year or two.

    Will the Valentine coin appreciate? What's the base price? :# To this "damage queen", it has many virtues as well as its problem..

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • This content has been removed.
  • Klif50Klif50 Posts: 698 ✭✭✭✭

    Rick on Pawn Stars had a gentleman come in a week or so ago with a disme. He called it a dis-me and his "call a friend expert" called it a dis-me. I have never heard that term referring to this piece but was curious about how to really say the name in case I ever add one of my collection. I'd hate to be saying it wrong.

  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with you on its virtues. Very pleasing overall. A tragedy, but actually really nice for what it is. I'm guessing $35K would be way too cheap for it today.

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • CoinosaurusCoinosaurus Posts: 9,645 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have concerns about the pedigree. I'd love for this to be Rittenhouse's coin, and would be delighted to see further evidence.

    The coin is unplated in the Henry Chapman 10/1919 catalog, which states in part:

    "Obv. evenly centered; on upper edge across the top of the coin and just above the inscription it is not struck up and shows the file marks in the planchet. R[ev.] not evenly centered, the milling only around half of it as it is struck a trifle low. This specimen has an interesting history being one of four that belonged to David Rittenhouse, the Astronomer and First director of the U. S. Mint, 1792-1795 and has never been out of the family until now."

    We are then led to believe the coin appeared in the Elder 6/1921 sale, there not attributed to Rittenhouse, and plated:

    That's all we have. Can we call the present example Rittenhouse's coin based on this?

  • This content has been removed.
  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ColonelJessup said:
    I agree with you on its virtues. Very pleasing overall. A tragedy, but actually really nice for what it is. I'm guessing $35K would be way too cheap for it today.

    $35K???

    Don't you mean 0.035 Milliard in United States Dollar units of account?

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • BaleyBaley Posts: 22,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Or 35 "thou" or 35 Large. It's hip.

    Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry

  • This content has been removed.
  • ParadisefoundParadisefound Posts: 8,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    dish me ;)

    @Icollecteverything said:
    That is a beautiful piece of history, but I don't even know how to say disme.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file