Home U.S. Coin Forum

Question about toned submissions

LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭

I was wondering of those who have submitted mint set toners could share some of their results? Grades or questionable toning? I went to the Round Rock show yesterday and picked up some really nice toners in some 1950's mint sets. ...few of the toners are real "moose" coins. ...thinking about submitting them.

Comments

  • djmdjm Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you post pictures we will be able to tell you what has a chance of grading and what doesn't

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If they are still in the original sealed mint packing, they should be more likely to pass as NT. And photos would help.

  • djmdjm Posts: 1,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:
    If they are still in the original sealed mint packing, they should be more likely to pass as NT. And photos would help.

    Mint sets weren't sealed until 1959. They were in cardboard cards prior to from 1947 - 1958.

  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭

    Thanks, I'll just send them in. The cents are consistent with toners in my (PCGS and NGC) set. I'll post some pics after they get back. It'll probably be a couple of months. I've exhausted the coin budget for this month. I did get a couple of really nice PCGS 65BN's (18-D and 26-D) for my set, though.

    David

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @djm said:

    @Smudge said:
    If they are still in the original sealed mint packing, they should be more likely to pass as NT. And photos would help.

    Mint sets weren't sealed until 1959. They were in cardboard cards prior to from 1947 - 1958.

    You are correct, should have said original mint packaging.

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,417 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @djm said:

    @Smudge said:
    If they are still in the original sealed mint packing, they should be more likely to pass as NT. And photos would help.

    Mint sets weren't sealed until 1959. They were in cardboard cards prior to from 1947 - 1958.

    They called it cello yellow!

    theknowitalltroll;
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @djm said:

    @Smudge said:
    If they are still in the original sealed mint packing, they should be more likely to pass as NT. And photos would help.

    Mint sets weren't sealed until 1959. They were in cardboard cards prior to from 1947 - 1958.

    The toning on those is still very distinctive.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,181 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Mint set toners have a distinct toning that should be recognizable to anyone who has handled them in the past. With that said, PCGS has been quick to place toned coins in genuine holders in recent months and has over corrected from the period where it slabbed all of those god awful ASEs (and not the PCI target toned ones). If the grade or designation does not fit, sometimes you must resubmit.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As a famous carnival huckster once said .... "You pay your money and you take your chances." Cheers, RickO

  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭

    I paid my money and took my chances. All of the mint set coins graded out. I'll post images once they post them. For now, here's what they graded:

    1953-D Lincoln MS64RB
    1953-D Lincoln MS65RB
    1953-S Lincoln MS64RB
    1955-D Lincoln MS64RB
    1955-D Lincoln MS64RB
    1955-S Lincoln MS64RB
    1955-D Jefferson MS65
    1955-D Jefferson MS64+

    David

  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭

    Here’s a couple pics I took with my phone before I sent them off. Sorry, it’s the best I could do since I don’t have a decent camera.


  • sparky64sparky64 Posts: 7,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats and thanks for following through with an update.
    Looking forward to seeing the TVs.

    "If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"

    My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress

  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    edited August 28, 2018 10:30PM

    Here's the TV pics... I'm pleased with the pics, though I think the nickels have much better eye appeal in my home lighting.








    David

  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Love the last Lincoln cent (53-D). Interesting mintmark on that one.

  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 29, 2018 5:23AM

    I really like the toned Jeffersons!

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • ShadyDaveShadyDave Posts: 2,217 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow, some sweet eye appeal there! Congrats on the grades...

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LincolnCentMan....Nice grades...thanks for following up with us... Cheers, RickO

  • divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,692 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Congrats on getting these graded.

    Nice grades. Donato

    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • ilikemonstersilikemonsters Posts: 767 ✭✭✭✭

    Beautiful, PM sent regarding one of the coins.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file