From all that I have seen, each proof Morgan has a unique look. Toning, contact marks, die characteristics like polish, cameo, etc. I don't think any other "high" run proofs are so varied.
This coin is part of an 1891 proof set, described by the auctioneer as follows:
1891 Morgan Silver Dollar. Proof-62 (PCGS). CAC. OGH. This toning is outstanding of blue and rose-gold, but the surfaces have a few old wipe lines that blend into the surfaces and scarcely show with the eye appealing shades of toning.
Comments
PR62?
Nice coin!
PR62 sounds good to me.
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
63
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
Regardless of the numbers - your coin has "presence." Nice find.
From all that I have seen, each proof Morgan has a unique look. Toning, contact marks, die characteristics like polish, cameo, etc. I don't think any other "high" run proofs are so varied.
Pf64 maybe 5, maybe 2, maybe details. This is one you can't grade accurately from even the best of photos.
PF62
Successful Trades: Swampboy,
pf 62
PF63.... A really nice Morgan.... Cheers, RickO
proof 64
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
PR AU58
63, 64 on a good day. I like it a lot.
it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide
This coin is part of an 1891 proof set, described by the auctioneer as follows:
1891 Morgan Silver Dollar. Proof-62 (PCGS). CAC. OGH. This toning is outstanding of blue and rose-gold, but the surfaces have a few old wipe lines that blend into the surfaces and scarcely show with the eye appealing shades of toning.
Hairlines must be pretty severe for that coin to have graded 62. Regardless, it's an attractively toned, albeit hairlined, example.
Pretty prominent "wipe lines".
I was going to say PR61/62.
Seems reasonable.
+1