Found out this was PMD

Options
mediatech
mediatech Posts: 52 ✭
edited June 17, 2018 11:36AM in U.S. Coin Forum

D

Comments

  • JBK
    JBK Posts: 17,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks to be that the thin layer of copper peeled back to expose the zinc. It appears raised, so it did not occur prior to striking. Post mint damage. Value, one cent or less (less if the zinc corrodes away before you spend it).

    That's the way I see it, anyway...

  • mediatech
    Options

    Yep, that's what I posted in my original note. You just made it sound a different way :)

  • Jcld
    Jcld Posts: 449 ✭✭✭
    Options

    @mediatech said:
    Yep, that's what I posted in my original note. You just made it sound a different way :)

    Except it isn't an error as much as it is just damaged.

  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I would term that anomaly PMD.... not a mint error... Cheers, RickO

  • mediatech
    Options

    Yes. I already knew that :)

  • Azurescens
    Azurescens Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    It's pretty common for people here to respond to the OP without reading the full thread.

  • CoinCrazyPA
    CoinCrazyPA Posts: 2,899 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Azurescens said:
    It's pretty common for people here to respond to the OP without reading the full thread.

    Agree

    Positive BST transactions: agentjim007, cohodk, CharlieC, Chrischampeon, DRG, 3 x delistamps, djdilliodon, gmherps13, jmski52, Meltdown, Mesquite, 2 x nibanny, themaster, 2 x segoja, Timbuk3, ve3rules, jom, Blackhawk, hchcoin, Relaxn, pitboss, blu62vette, Jfoot13, Jinx86, jfoot13,Ronb

    Successful Trades: Swampboy,
  • Jimnight
    Jimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'd say PMD.

  • mediatech
    Options

    @CoinCrazyPA said:

    @Azurescens said:
    It's pretty common for people here to respond to the OP without reading the full thread.

    Agree

    And someone right after your comment didn't read anything, and just gave his half-cent of wisdom :)

  • Jimnight
    Jimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Did the OP read his own discussion title ?
    "Nice error on a 1992-P Lincoln Cent".
    Clearly it's not a lamination it's PMD; and who are you to assume and state on this forum that I didn't read anything and have to make a sarcastic comment ... " and just gave his half-cent of wisdom ".

  • mediatech
    mediatech Posts: 52 ✭
    edited June 17, 2018 11:33AM
    Options

    I found out how you ignore someone on here. I didn't want to, but.... :(

  • BlindedByEgo
    BlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Got to give it to the poster - creative use of edits. Just another troll.

  • Azurescens
    Azurescens Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Jimnight said:
    Did the OP read his own discussion title ?
    "Nice error on a 1992-P Lincoln Cent".
    Clearly it's not a lamination it's PMD; and who are you to assume and state on this forum that I didn't read anything and have to make a sarcastic comment ... " and just gave his half-cent of wisdom ".

    I said nothing at you man. If you read enough threads you'll see what I mean. There are experts in these fields who don't have time (or need) to read responses as they'll respond to OP. It's a part of the character of the forum.

    If you were the leading authority on the matter, why spend your own time (for free) reading dreck? Some of these people spent 40+ years and are legitimate experts. They've no need to read further discourse on the subject at hand.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file