Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1909-S VDB Cent Data

RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

Collectors love 1909-S VDB cents, so here is some data that will be of interest to many. The top table was published in an article I wrote in 2006. The bottom table is a recent analysis from the same original data. (In late 1909, Mint Director Andrew requested lists of all dies used during the year, and the number of pieces struck from each die. These data were supplied by all the Mints. This is the only year for which these details exist. Normally, the only statements were of total ties used and average number of pieces struck.)

Ten pairs of 1909 dies were initially sent to San Francisco. When the notice arrived to cease production with the VDB reverse dies, this mint had used only 5 reverse dies paired with 4 obverse dies. All the VDB reverse dies were returned to Philadelphia on August 12.

Comments

  • Options
    CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting report.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,987 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the research.

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice to know.

  • Options
    EagleEyeEagleEye Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
  • Options
    RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Rick - Wonderful link. Now we can match observation with documentation, each independent of the other, for the four S-VDB obverses. :)

  • Options
    dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,750 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Excellent information. Has anyone done the same work with denoting the different reverse dies as they have with the obverse? Looks like die 202 did some overtime on the no vdb cents.

    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • Options
    RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @dbldie55 said:
    Excellent information. Has anyone done the same work with denoting the different reverse dies as they have with the obverse? Looks like die 202 did some overtime on the no vdb cents.

    I'm hoping someone has -- I've drafted an article pulling the pieces together, but there's a big gap for reverses. Reverse dies will be harder to identify because the initials were part of the hub.

  • Options
    Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The reason the obverses are "easy" is we have a big "S" to examine for position. Note: some folks believe that more than 4 obverse dies were used but the positional difference is so minute that it will take some "work" to prove.

    The reverses can be mapped by die breaks, one specific clash, and the occasionally seen die polish on gems. Unfortunately. the "periods" between the VDB tend to get filled. B)

  • Options
    divecchiadivecchia Posts: 6,714 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Excellent info indeed.

    Thanks for sharing it.

    Donato

    Hobbyist & Collector (not an investor).
    Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set

    Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
  • Options
    JcldJcld Posts: 449 ✭✭✭

    Great info I the 1909-VDB S was my first love so to speak and the one coin I always wanted as a kid.

  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,062 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I wonder what number each corresponds to in the figures above. 201 produced a lot less coins than the others.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Options
    EagleEyeEagleEye Posts: 7,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Only two 1909-S Indian reverse dies are known and they are easy to distinguish. It should be easy to assign which die was #21 and which was #22.

    Rick Snow, Eagle Eye Rare Coins, Inc.Check out my new web site:
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great information on this coin... Although not as rare as so many people assume, it is still a desirable coin for Lincoln collectors (and others)..... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @EagleEye said:
    Only two 1909-S Indian reverse dies are known and they are easy to distinguish. It should be easy to assign which die was #21 and which was #22.

    Right. There's a considerable difference in mintage between the two dies, That should show up in modern coin counts - possibly even TPG population reports.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file