I am with you and assigned my grade of 66/66+ but this is a piece I would like to see in hand to give a final opinion.
Although I see no friction in the fields from the images provided, this is a piece that may show a hint of rub (most likely not "real" circulation wear) but could possibly be an AU58 on a bad day for the grading team.
I'm sticking to my guns though and will give it a boxcar grade.
I took a long look at your pictures and made my guess/range ahead of reading the posts.
67 - perhaps shot at 67+.
Head is very full. Good separation at branch hand. Hip looks nice. Sun looks nice to me, too. I do see some chatter by the Y but the right field looks good otherwise. Pic looks like coin has potent luster. A very clean good looking half.
Reverse looks very good, too. I see three areas of very minor noise on feathers. The feathers on the eagle's left leg are not as well developed as 41Ps can be.
If I had to pick on the coin, I'd say it falls a little short in the strike dept.
After looking at the other posts: I can understand the preponderance of 65/66 if the half was dipped.
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Other than perhaps some light haze obscuring some of the luster on the obverse, it looks like a pretty high grade example. Some of the experts here are guessing 66 or even higher, so no need for me to venture a grade.
The luster looks great on this coin. Surprisingly it didn't grade higher. I have a feeling it would grade higher if sent in today. I'm not into the crack game. I love the older holders.
Comments
I am thinking your "Walking Liberty Half" would grade MS65
Looks really squeaky clean...save for a bit of haze or possibly dip residue in upper right field.....I'll go 66/66+
I agree with MS65.... Seems like a bit of chatter on Liberty's leg and the sun... Cheers, RickO
The left hand concerns me, but I'm not an expert on Walkers. Nice coin though. Hard to tell from the photos.
I think that is high. I might even say 66 but hard to tell on photos with my phone screen
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
Looks Clean. I'll go 65 or 66?
100% Positive BST transactions
I am with you and assigned my grade of 66/66+ but this is a piece I would like to see in hand to give a final opinion.
Although I see no friction in the fields from the images provided, this is a piece that may show a hint of rub (most likely not "real" circulation wear) but could possibly be an AU58 on a bad day for the grading team.
I'm sticking to my guns though and will give it a boxcar grade.
If I had to guess, I'm in the MS65 camp.
Looks really nice.
Donato
Donato's Complete US Type Set ---- Donato's Dansco 7070 Modified Type Set ---- Donato's Basic U.S. Coin Design Set
Successful transactions: Shrub68 (Jim), MWallace (Mike)
66
I'm guessing 64 because of the slightly weak central obverse. (I usually undergrade)
Pete
It's 66
[Ebay Store - Come Visit]
Roosevelt Registry
transactions with cucamongacoin, FHC, mtinis, bigjpst, Rob41281, toyz4geo, erwindoc, add your name here!!!
66+ A beauty.
I see a well struck 66
Nice coin
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder
I'm at a very nice 66.
Looks like a 66.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
66
I took a long look at your pictures and made my guess/range ahead of reading the posts.
67 - perhaps shot at 67+.
Head is very full. Good separation at branch hand. Hip looks nice. Sun looks nice to me, too. I do see some chatter by the Y but the right field looks good otherwise. Pic looks like coin has potent luster. A very clean good looking half.
Reverse looks very good, too. I see three areas of very minor noise on feathers. The feathers on the eagle's left leg are not as well developed as 41Ps can be.
If I had to pick on the coin, I'd say it falls a little short in the strike dept.
After looking at the other posts: I can understand the preponderance of 65/66 if the half was dipped.
Nice half. Congratulations.
I said 66+ but maybe 66 depending on how flashy it is in hand
I’m impressed that it’s the standing variety.
m
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Other than perhaps some light haze obscuring some of the luster on the obverse, it looks like a pretty high grade example. Some of the experts here are guessing 66 or even higher, so no need for me to venture a grade.
I like it. 65.
Nice gem; what usually keeps these back are field tics/chatter, more so than having a clear "sun" or needing a totally full strike..
The luster looks great on this coin. Surprisingly it didn't grade higher. I have a feeling it would grade higher if sent in today. I'm not into the crack game. I love the older holders.
Nice pickup! Glad that your going to leave it be in that OGH.....I would too.
@Wabbit2313 has a 63 that is similarly undergraded in a white label old fattie.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I agreed, way undergraded
BHNC #203
63... WOW!!
clean fields will make it a 66.. CAC .. Gold bean
You were close! Gold CAC.
.

.
.
On the 1941, it would have to upgrade to a 66 to make it worth while sending in, and that is even questionable.
@Wabbit2313 I'm sorry!! Love that coin......looks 66 just like the OP's!! I guess that was my point.
Slab is awesome, too!!
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
@Wabbit2313 killer slab!
Both slabs are awesome! My guess is MS65 and I would leave it in that old holder for sure!
My YouTube Channel
Great find @Peace_dollar88, looks gem for sure.
Here's mine; It got a gold CAC sticker late last week (Don't have updated photos yet).