Do you think I have a 1964-D/D RPM South on this Quarter ?

Comments

• BlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 10, 2018 10:06PM

  Funny, there's definitely doubling there - nice find - but it doesn't really look like any of the examples. Closest is -004? I hope to learn something from the experts here.

  Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1

  0
• dcarr Posts: 9,123 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 10, 2018 11:44PM

  I think that is strike doubling, not due to a re-punched mint mark.

  Moonlight Mint

  2
• Treashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 4:00AM

  Agreed, MD

  Frank
  
  BHNC #203
  
  

  0
• Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 4:26AM

  !!!

  Timbuk3

  0
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 5:13AM

  It does not match any of the examples... So I tend to agree with dcarr....Cheers, RickO

  0
• BuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,547 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 7:41AM

  Your post was well researched and presented. Kudos to you!

  I agree with the comments above, however. It looks more like "metal movement" than a true RPM.

  Pete

  "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon

  0
• FredWeinberg Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 7:46AM

  Mechanical doubling. Not an RPM, imo

  Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.

  0
• RogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 9:56AM

  Nice post, and an interesting coin.

  0
• DIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 10:33AM

  I'm in the MD camp.

  0
• Azurescens Posts: 2,783 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 6:23PM

  It's nice MD. No RPM but still fun to look at, and as common in 1964 as they were through the 50s.

  0
• cmerlo1 Posts: 7,960 ✭✭✭✭✭

  April 11, 2018 8:16PM

  Strike doubled mintmarks are extremely common on quarters from the 50's and 60's.

  You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.

  0