GTG, freshly graded PCGS Morgan (Grade Posted)
FadeToBlack
Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
Grade is here if you want to skip the comments
Very EDS coin, for what it's worth. Flashy luster. Can't VAM it to save my life. Looks like VAM 2 but earlier die state? I dunno. High res here.
GTG, freshly graded PCGS Morgan (Grade Posted)
This is a public poll: others will see what you voted for.
4
Comments
Let me be first to say solid MS66.
bob
I thought 66 but guessed 65. Sure is a nice smooth face. I like the toning but might be hiding something. Love this coin's look. Congrats
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
I like the details, but am apparently very poor at following directions.
64? Nice coin!
My YouTube Channel
i went with ms 65. if it does a 66 thats fine to
66 for me, nice pics!
I said details because of the two finger Prints
Best place to buy !
Bronze Associate member
At least you can poll correctly, so I'd chalk it up as a win.
Guess I need to defend my 63! (?)
It's based on what appears to be excessive nicks/dings/(scratches?) above IGWT on the reverse, and below the jaw on the obverse. I wanted to say 64....but went conservative.
Toned coins are tough from photos. My "complaints" may be nothing more than shadows and artifacts from the toning.....
Looks mark-free enough for a 66, but I don't see enough luster to pull off a 66. So, 65 was my vote.
Picture looks 64 to me. Minimal marks, but where’s the luster?
I'm in the 65 camp.
Based on it being a 66 then deducting a point for the mottled toning and some "busy" areas
I really do like it.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
...I was under the impression that EDS coins won't have as much luster as a later die state...I thought the older the die state, the brighter the luster is...up to a certain point that is...Is that correct or no?
I went 65, but if the luster is there it could be higher.
The pic is flat . . .but description of luster, plus a very nice cheek and prime focal areas . . . . . 66.
Not a bad strike for an "O" Mint . . . . . . . .
Nice coin!
Drunner
66 for me.
I'm guessing MS 65. This common date tends to not get any respect.
Clean cheek and full feathers. Nice!
100% Positive BST transactions
MS65
What a lovely coin. Bet that puppy spent some time in a Wayte Raymond.
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
Nice gem.
Nice clean cheek has to be a 65, sure wish we had some luster, hopefully just the lighting in the picture.
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
I voted 66. I think the small hit on her cheek just above the jaw line and a few other small marks kept it from a 67. I am taking into consideration your remarks regarding the flashiness of the fields. Which are very clean.
I went 64. Could be the pics but it looks like the luster isn't there for the 65
Not voting based on the image. Having written that, I hope the coin grade met your expectations.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
FTR, I like the coin. And while it should grade based on the image, making the determination of whether it graded at my grade level is something I am unable to do.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Very nice O mint strike. I like the toning but the graders are finicky.
65+
My expert opinion is saying MS65
Nice toning but not really colorful. Smooth cheeks and fields with just a few small lines. I think it's a 65 gem.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I feel like I’ve seen this coin somewhere before....
I like the new photos better. (And thus, I like the coin better). I'll buy 65 now.
Hey, I finally got one right.
It really is a nice O mint example.
"If I say something in the woods and my wife isn't there to hear it.....am I still wrong?"
My Washington Quarter Registry set...in progress
MS65..... before I looked....
Nice detail on the devices... Cheers, RickO
That 2nd photo shows the luster much better than the first. I was in the 65 camp and I'd give you that + if it was up to me.
Pete
Louis Armstrong