1860 1C Brunk O-59, Oil of Ice (Regular Strike) - What's the deal?

So, I'm thumbing through CoinFacts and ran across this coin with a pop of 1 that has it's own coin number. What's the story?
Doug
0
So, I'm thumbing through CoinFacts and ran across this coin with a pop of 1 that has it's own coin number. What's the story?
Comments
This is an example of a counterstamped coin, in this case by a patent medicine company.
The 'Oil of Ice' mark, according to the Brunk reference book,
I didn’t knowbcounterstamps were getting their own PCGS number. But this is not my area either. Interesting it showed up as a variety under Indian Cents on CoinFacts. Thanks for the info
Nice that it has a PCGS coin number and is straight graded.
Here's the cert verification page. F15 with a pop of 1/0. Pretty low grade top pop!
Here are some more found online:
That is a new one for me..... though, if I had found one, I would have kept it.... Thanks for the history, learned something new today...
Keeps me young.... Cheers, RickO
Not a great name for a product.
If my ice had oil in it, I'd find a cleaner water source.
What is PCGS thinking straight grading an altered coin. Who would collect this stuff anyway? Or is exonumia now gradable?
OINK
Thanks for sharing !!!
seriously?
They are highly collectible
BHNC #203
I'll take all you have and pay you as culls.
BHNC #203
Straight grading aside, is this one coin number used for all of one type of counterstamp? one denomination? I can't imagine how they can quantify it. It's one coin number and one coin, and it is because of post mint "damage." Doesn't make sense for it to have its own number and then show up as a variety in the Indian Head Cent section of CoinFacts.
I can't comment on whether or not it should have straight graded or if it deserves it's own number, but I will say that attributed counterstamps are documented and don't qualify (in my opinion) as mere PMD. (Technically they are PMD, of course, but once recognized and documented they join their own class of exonumia).
I don't disagree at all. That's why I put it in quotes. I also have a chopmarked dollar too ...
I find it bizarre that it would be listed as a variety for the 1860 Indian Head Cent. It's not.
Ok, here's what I can tell from briefly looking through the website. PCGS will certify and attribute "tokens" listed in the Brunk book. If I type it in the search field, about 25 different ones come up. I don't see that anyone is trying to build a set of these, so there is nothing listed for such a set.