Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • Options
    TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭✭✭

    dumb

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Either he shilled this or canceled it ?????

  • Options
    Peace_dollar88Peace_dollar88 Posts: 1,257 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow Price realized on old auction to price asking seems to be a far stretch if you ask me!

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2017 10:27AM

    @Peace_dollar88 said:
    Wow Price realized on old auction to price asking seems to be a far stretch if you ask me!

    Same seller, the $200 auction ended yesterday and the BIN is Today, Same Seller!!!!

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have watched this coin for some time now. I was thinking about pulling the trigger last night, but after close inspection of the photos, IMO the coin is mislabeled. IMO (without having the coin in hand) the coin is improperly annealed on a defective planchet.

  • Options
    FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭✭✭

    EoC - I agree -

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • Options
    mvs7mvs7 Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Regardless of the possible mislabeling, you'd think that the second BIN price is a typo and the dealer meant to enter $245 rather than $245,000.

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2017 10:45AM

    @mvs7 said:
    Regardless of the possible mislabeling, you'd think that the second BIN price is a typo and the dealer meant to enter $245 rather than $245,000.

    No typo as I have watched this coin for awhile now. Seller always had high BIN, but tried an auction and (did not get his price) IMO.

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2017 12:41PM

    @FredWeinberg said:
    EoC - I agree -

    Fred, abut the mislabeling?

    The NGC description seemed odd and "the look" of the coin is an improperly annealed look. I think the second error of the defective planchet threw the graders off.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well... he will not get $245,000 ... that is for certain.... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 34,476 ✭✭✭✭✭

    and theres FREE SHIPPING. ill still pass lol

  • Options
    mvs7mvs7 Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @braddick said:
    It's now $406,000.00 BIN?
    I think the seller is having some fun with us.

    LOL. Ok, which one of you is listing this coin? ;)

  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    MikeInFLMikeInFL Posts: 10,192 ✭✭✭✭

    I believe this is either a mistaken listing or an attempt at advertising, depending on my mood. lol

    Collector of Large Cents, US Type, and modern pocket change.
  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,782 ✭✭✭✭✭

    WOW.............the $406,000.00 dollar one even arrives before Christmas!

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 40,231 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Price raise

    Act Fast

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • This content has been removed.
  • Options
    ParlousJoeParlousJoe Posts: 451 ✭✭✭

    Wow, he was/is really waiting for some sucker with a lot of money (unfortunately, there are a lot of them out there today) to come a long is my guess.

  • Options
    FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭✭✭

    EoC - yes, I meant the label description.

    I'm not correct 100% of the time either,
    with all my descriptions, but I think this
    one was mis-labeled for some reason.

    From the photos, looks like a very nice
    mis-annealed planchet. There were a lot
    of them that came out like this from 199
    to about 2005 - (mostly 2004-05).

    They all have diff. amounts and areas of
    the red coloring, but they're all the 'same',
    as far as the general look. And many, but
    not all, have either the red or black flakes
    that lift off the planchet in some of the areas,
    like this one.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • Options
    FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭✭✭

    And as far as pricing, that's a style
    that's been used before, for various
    reasons.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 40,231 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is likely an end of roll planchet??

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    mvs7mvs7 Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Look how much I can save today! ;)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file