Contemporary Counterfeit Coins

Options
RogerB
RogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

Is anyone working on a detailed treatment of counterfeit US coins from the 1800-1950 period? This seems like an interesting and potentially useful field of study.

Comments

  • Treashunt
    Treashunt Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Agreed, it would be interesting to see

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • messydesk
    messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The name Winston Zack comes to mind.

  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 7, 2017 10:27AM
    Options

    Since most who could date these things are dead, in most cases, it would only be conjecture as to when the fakes were made. Some coins that actually are contemporary have been published by Bust Half dollar collectors. A few fakes are imaged in Riddell's book also. IMO, the lead fakes that are all over should not be considered. IMO, only the decent fakes from hand cut dies, Machin's, or coins such as the Henning nickels fit as contemporary. Most die struck counterfeit gold is also too modern and not contemporary. See the problem?

    Thanks, I just looked up Mr. Zack. That's a start.

  • messydesk
    messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Insider2 said:
    Since most who could date these things are dead, in most cases, it would only be conjecture as to when the fakes were made. Some coins that actually are contemporary have been published by Bust Half dollar collectors. A few fakes are imaged in Riddell's book also. IMO, the lead fakes that are all over should not be considered. IMO, only the decent fakes from hand cut dies, Machin's, or coins such as the Henning nickels fit as contemporary. Most die struck counterfeit gold is also too modern and not contemporary. See the problem?

    One problem is differentiating among contemporary counterfeits, counterfeits made to fool collectors, counterfeits made at the request of collectors (early copper electrotypes, for example). To generalize, it's not always easy to tell the motive behind the piece.

  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 7, 2017 12:24PM
    Options

    I've never considered electrotypes to fit either. I believe most were made either by request or to fool collectors and not to circulate. That may be a better breakdown...circulating contemporary counterfeits. That's what Zack's pieces are.

  • carabonnair
    carabonnair Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    When possible, Winston is using contemporary newspaper accounts of counterfeits.

  • Zoins
    Zoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @messydesk said:

    @Insider2 said:
    Since most who could date these things are dead, in most cases, it would only be conjecture as to when the fakes were made. Some coins that actually are contemporary have been published by Bust Half dollar collectors. A few fakes are imaged in Riddell's book also. IMO, the lead fakes that are all over should not be considered. IMO, only the decent fakes from hand cut dies, Machin's, or coins such as the Henning nickels fit as contemporary. Most die struck counterfeit gold is also too modern and not contemporary. See the problem?

    One problem is differentiating among contemporary counterfeits, counterfeits made to fool collectors, counterfeits made at the request of collectors (early copper electrotypes, for example). To generalize, it's not always easy to tell the motive behind the piece.

    I thought contemporary counterfeits were made to fool merchants and banks, not collectors. Collectors come along mostly after a coin has had a useful circulating life.

  • messydesk
    messydesk Posts: 20,814 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Zoins said:

    @messydesk said:

    @Insider2 said:
    Since most who could date these things are dead, in most cases, it would only be conjecture as to when the fakes were made. Some coins that actually are contemporary have been published by Bust Half dollar collectors. A few fakes are imaged in Riddell's book also. IMO, the lead fakes that are all over should not be considered. IMO, only the decent fakes from hand cut dies, Machin's, or coins such as the Henning nickels fit as contemporary. Most die struck counterfeit gold is also too modern and not contemporary. See the problem?

    One problem is differentiating among contemporary counterfeits, counterfeits made to fool collectors, counterfeits made at the request of collectors (early copper electrotypes, for example). To generalize, it's not always easy to tell the motive behind the piece.

    I thought contemporary counterfeits were made to fool merchants and banks, not collectors. Collectors come along mostly after a coin has had a useful circulating life.

    Yes, that's the definition of and motivation for making contemporary counterfeits. It's not necessarily trivial to discern that motivation from only the coin, however.

  • RogerB
    RogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • RogerB
    RogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Electrotype and similar pieces were generally made for educational uses and not to fool anyone. They gradually fell out of favor as prices for rare varieties advanced and more people entered the hobby.

    Many circulating counterfeits were very good and there are many letters in Mint archives attesting to difficulties in determining of a piece was real of fake. A Loudoun Snowden discussed some very deceptive counterfeits in several letters. The Morgan dollar fakes with micro mintmarks also are quite deceptive.

  • mustangmanbob
    mustangmanbob Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Maybe the best fakes have not been found out yet.

  • Insider2
    Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Cannot wait for those books. Then the value of all those pieces will soar - just as the CA gold "charms" have done.

  • Treashunt
    Treashunt Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Insider2 said:

    Cannot wait for those books. Then the value of all those pieces will soar - just as the CA gold "charms" have done.

    I should find mine [the CA gold charm] and post it for info.

    Thanks.

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • TomB
    TomB Posts: 23,189 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 7, 2017 9:42PM
    Options

    Keith Davignon has published an extensive die marriage listing for early half dollars (1839 and prior, if I recall correctly). The work is fantastic and has many wonderful images.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • ernie11
    ernie11 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    The Liberty Seated Collectors Club has a nice set of pages on contemporary counterfeits with images, at http://www.lsccweb.org/Contemporary_Counterfeits.htm. I have an 1872-CC dime that is a contemp counterfeit.

  • Treashunt
    Treashunt Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @TomB said:
    Keith Davignon has published an extensive die marriage listing for early half dollars (1839 and prior, if I recall correctly). The work is fantastic and has many wonderful images.

    yes, great reference, and a great read

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I have a counterfeit 1902 CC Morgan that circulated.... Very well done... Cheers, RickO

  • colonialjohn
    Options
    Primarily a collector of error coins over the next decade after collecting for 40 years. Have collected & studied every coin series in the Western Hemishere - yes - even ...
  • dcarr
    dcarr Posts: 10,257 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Insider2 said:
    Since most who could date these things are dead, in most cases, it would only be conjecture as to when the fakes were made. Some coins that actually are contemporary have been published by Bust Half dollar collectors. A few fakes are imaged in Riddell's book also. IMO, the lead fakes that are all over should not be considered. IMO, only the decent fakes from hand cut dies, Machin's, or coins such as the Henning nickels fit as contemporary. Most die struck counterfeit gold is also too modern and not contemporary. See the problem?

    Thanks, I just looked up Mr. Zack. That's a start.

    I think a comprehensive book on the subject would be very interesting.
    The criteria that I would use to define a vintage counterfeit that would be included in such a book would have to be:
    1) The piece must have been made with the intent to spend at face value.
    2) The piece circulated alongside genuine coins.
    3) Die struck (no castings).

  • Zoins
    Zoins Posts: 34,489 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @messydesk said:

    @Insider2 said:
    Since most who could date these things are dead, in most cases, it would only be conjecture as to when the fakes were made. Some coins that actually are contemporary have been published by Bust Half dollar collectors. A few fakes are imaged in Riddell's book also. IMO, the lead fakes that are all over should not be considered. IMO, only the decent fakes from hand cut dies, Machin's, or coins such as the Henning nickels fit as contemporary. Most die struck counterfeit gold is also too modern and not contemporary. See the problem?

    One problem is differentiating among contemporary counterfeits, counterfeits made to fool collectors, counterfeits made at the request of collectors (early copper electrotypes, for example). To generalize, it's not always easy to tell the motive behind the piece.

    Are there any made at the request of collectors to fool other collectors?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file