I'm trying to get better on grading coins...Please tell me if I'm close?
in2Coins
Posts: 365 ✭✭✭✭✭
NA
0
in2Coins
Posts: 365 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
QT
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
I realize the coin has been stuffed into an old cardboard holder to simulate an estate sale, but that color isn't natural.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Yup. No Grade. Someone has been doing naughty things with this coin. After a dip to remove the damage it might still be a decent (but boring white) coin.
if it grades I would say ms65. Looks funky
Coin is not mine......photo job for someone. Didn’t think that the color is natural myself.
No. AT.
Lance.
Frustrating to see these coins played with like this.
"A dog breaks your heart only one time and that is when they pass on". Unknown
Looks 65/66 but would not grade.
As others have said, it's AT.
Like others have already said; it looks like like a gem coin, but the toning is artificial, so it won't straight grade as is.
I thought 66, but it has "ricko tarnish".
Pete
I think its gorgeous. And the back of the wagon is well
struck .Not sold on the AT. 66.
AT but 65... Cheers, RickO
It definitely needs a bath!
My YouTube Channel
He came for "grading", not rating. On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd say 70.... bucks, that is. Dip it and it goes over a hundred.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
It's only a guess not knowing what is hiding under the fake toning.
AT.
66 if it wasn't funky.
These days, Oregon's need a fair amount of hits or slightly subdued luster to get graded all the way down to a lowly 65. Silver commems have really been impacted by gradeflation, which is one of the reasons the series has gone nowhere for years.
If it wasn't for the QT, it would be a 63. Too much going on in the blanket, right leg, and left arm. Can't tell much on the reverse due to the spotted AT.
At any rate, BB in my opinion.
Cheers
Bob
It'll never break the color barrier. I'm sorry to say it appears to be AT.
AT.