I think it went 62 no FB, at least I cant tell from the image. It looks like there is a scuff on the holder preventing me from seeing the entire center bands. The fields and Liberty's cheek have enough chatter and hairlines that I just can't see it going higher than 62. On the plus side, it looks to have pretty decent luster though.
63.... hard to determine what that is on the middle bands... almost looks like extension of reeds... and not sure what is in the field in front of Liberty.... Cheers, RickO
Comments
MS63FSB?
bob
NGC, so I'll go 64FB...
64
I think it went 62 no FB, at least I cant tell from the image. It looks like there is a scuff on the holder preventing me from seeing the entire center bands. The fields and Liberty's cheek have enough chatter and hairlines that I just can't see it going higher than 62. On the plus side, it looks to have pretty decent luster though.
58
AU58 but I don't like the marks in the obverse field.
AU 58. Looks like a little overall scruffiness in the fields and on the devices. Really hard to tell from that lighting, though.
63FB
62
58 in my book.
Ken
63
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder
I'm in the 58 group.
63.... hard to determine what that is on the middle bands... almost looks like extension of reeds... and not sure what is in the field in front of Liberty.... Cheers, RickO